Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs WOMN
RECS vs WOMN Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs WOMN
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Volume$813
Net Assets3.63B
Impact Shares Women’s Empowerment ETF
Price$40.29
Change-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Volume$373
Net Assets63.47M
RECS vs WOMN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. WOMN commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and WOMN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.63B vs. WOMN (63.5M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than WOMN: RECS (12.796) vs WOMN (5.209). RECS was incepted earlier than WOMN: RECS (6 years) vs WOMN (7 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than WOMN (0.75). RECS has a higher turnover WOMN (33.00) vs WOMN (33.00).
| RECS | WOMN | RECS / WOMN | |
| Gain YTD | 12.796 | 5.209 | 246% |
| Net Assets | 3.63B | 63.5M | 5,718% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.75 | 20% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.62 | 1.12 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 7 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | WOMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 60% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 12 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
WOMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that WOMN and KMB have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WOMN and KMB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WOMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WOMN | 100% | -0.24% | ||
| KMB - WOMN | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.55% | ||
| CARR - WOMN | 13% Poorly correlated | +3.10% | ||
| MDLZ - WOMN | 12% Poorly correlated | +1.38% | ||
| GWW - WOMN | 12% Poorly correlated | -3.36% | ||
| ELS - WOMN | 11% Poorly correlated | +1.36% | ||
More | ||||