Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs WLTG
RECS vs WLTG Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs WLTG
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.18
Change+$0.15 (+0.37%)
Volume$100
Net Assets4.53B
WealthTrust DBS Long Term Growth ETF
Price$36.01
Change+$0.14 (+0.39%)
Volume$7.09K
Net Assets63.85M
RECS vs WLTG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. WLTG commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and WLTG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.53B vs. WLTG (63.8M). WLTG has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: WLTG (22.824) vs RECS (18.460). RECS was incepted earlier than WLTG: RECS (6 years) vs WLTG (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than WLTG (0.75). WLTG has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | WLTG | RECS / WLTG | |
| Gain YTD | 18.460 | 22.824 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 4.53B | 63.8M | 7,107% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.75 | 20% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 185.61 | 26% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 0.02 | 2,588% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | WLTG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 68% | 6 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 87% | 6 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 70% | 16 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 71% | 6 days ago 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.54% | ||
More | ||||
WLTG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WLTG has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WLTG jumps, then META could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WLTG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WLTG | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| META - WLTG | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| SYF - WLTG | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
| AMZN - WLTG | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| AVGO - WLTG | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.20% | ||
| MCHP - WLTG | 58% Loosely correlated | +6.16% | ||
More | ||||