Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SPYC
RECS vs SPYC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SPYC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$40.57
Change-$0.61 (-1.48%)
Volume$624.29K
Net Assets4.36B
Simplify US Equity PLUS Convexity ETF
Price$42.80
Change-$1.03 (-2.35%)
Volume$3.79K
Net Assets93.29M
RECS vs SPYC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SPYC commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a StrongBuy and SPYC is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.36B vs. SPYC (93.3M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than SPYC: RECS (18.949) vs SPYC (17.972). RECS was incepted earlier than SPYC: RECS (6 years) vs SPYC (5 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SPYC (0.53). RECS has a higher turnover SPYC (8.00) vs SPYC (8.00).
| RECS | SPYC | RECS / SPYC | |
| Gain YTD | 18.949 | 17.972 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 4.36B | 93.3M | 4,677% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.53 | 28% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 8.00 | 613% |
| Yield | 0.59 | 0.87 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SPYC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 70% | 10 days ago 73% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PYZ | 105.28 | 1.65 | +1.59% |
| Invesco DW Basic Materials Momt ETF | |||
| XMVM | 61.13 | 0.20 | +0.34% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momt ETF | |||
| TMDV | 46.76 | N/A | N/A |
| ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF | |||
| BST | 41.36 | -0.13 | -0.31% |
| BlackRock Science and Technology Trust | |||
| OOQB | 15.75 | -0.21 | -1.32% |
| One+One Nasdaq-100 and Bitcoin ETF | |||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.24% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.49% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||