Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.05
Change-$0.15 (-0.38%)
Volume$1.91M
Net Assets3.57B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$34.81
Change-$0.10 (-0.29%)
Volume$24.74K
Net Assets213.7M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SAMT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.57B vs. SAMT (214M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (19.478) vs RECS (12.796). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.66). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | 12.796 | 19.478 | 66% |
| Net Assets | 3.57B | 214M | 1,670% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.66 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 91.00 | 54% |
| Yield | 0.62 | 1.17 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SAMT and RKLB have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SAMT and RKLB's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| RKLB - SAMT | 22% Poorly correlated | +6.63% | ||
| MMC - SAMT | 19% Poorly correlated | -1.15% | ||
| PLTR - SAMT | 18% Poorly correlated | -1.94% | ||
| OKLO - SAMT | 17% Poorly correlated | +0.26% | ||
| SMR - SAMT | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.16% | ||
More | ||||