Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.31
Change+$0.09 (+0.22%)
Volume$534.29K
Net Assets4.78B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$39.57
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
Volume$6.72K
Net Assets362.49M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a StrongBuy and SAMT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.78B vs. SAMT (362M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (35.816) vs RECS (19.324). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.66). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | 19.324 | 35.816 | 54% |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 362M | 1,320% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.66 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 91.00 | 54% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 1.09 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| GEV - SAMT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| SMR - SAMT | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| LAZ - SAMT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.51% | ||
| RKLB - SAMT | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PLTR - SAMT | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.02% | ||
More | ||||