Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$38.19
Change+$0.14 (+0.37%)
Volume$411.03K
Net Assets3.21B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$35.64
Change+$0.31 (+0.88%)
Volume$23.49K
Net Assets195.71M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and SAMT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.21B vs. SAMT (196M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (22.338) vs RECS (10.312). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (4 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.66). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | 10.312 | 22.338 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 3.21B | 196M | 1,636% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.66 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 91.00 | 54% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 72% | 6 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.81% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +0.89% | ||
| PWR - SAMT | 74% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| GEV - SAMT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.30% | ||
| GS - SAMT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| ISRG - SAMT | 65% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| CEG - SAMT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||