Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$35.34
Change-$0.46 (-1.28%)
Volume$422.01K
Net Assets2.9B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$32.68
Change-$0.13 (-0.40%)
Volume$44.91K
Net Assets164.85M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Buy and SAMT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 2.9B vs. SAMT (165M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (12.167) vs RECS (2.080). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (3 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.66). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | 2.080 | 12.167 | 17% |
| Net Assets | 2.9B | 165M | 1,759% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.66 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 91.00 | 54% |
| Yield | 0.69 | 1.26 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 72% | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -1.28% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.53% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.82% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| GEV - SAMT | 73% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| PWR - SAMT | 73% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| GS - SAMT | 69% Closely correlated | -1.85% | ||
| TLN - SAMT | 66% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CEG - SAMT | 63% Loosely correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||