Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs SAMT
RECS vs SAMT Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs SAMT
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$37.37
Change+$0.28 (+0.75%)
Volume$347.58K
Net Assets3.1B
Strategas Macro Thematic Opp ETF
Price$34.19
Change+$0.49 (+1.45%)
Volume$6.83K
Net Assets182.37M
RECS vs SAMT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. SAMT commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and SAMT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.1B vs. SAMT (182M). SAMT has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: SAMT (17.350) vs RECS (7.943). RECS was incepted earlier than SAMT: RECS (6 years) vs SAMT (3 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than SAMT (0.66). SAMT has a higher turnover RECS (49.00) vs RECS (49.00).
| RECS | SAMT | RECS / SAMT | |
| Gain YTD | 7.943 | 17.350 | 46% |
| Net Assets | 3.1B | 182M | 1,703% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.66 | 23% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 91.00 | 54% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 1.19 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | SAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 17 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.58% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||
SAMT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAMT has been closely correlated with GEV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SAMT jumps, then GEV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAMT | 100% | +1.45% | ||
| GEV - SAMT | 74% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| PWR - SAMT | 72% Closely correlated | +3.51% | ||
| GS - SAMT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.09% | ||
| TLN - SAMT | 66% Closely correlated | +3.63% | ||
| CEG - SAMT | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||