Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.98
Change+$0.24 (+0.60%)
Volume$662.45K
Net Assets4.1B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$64.32
Change+$0.33 (+0.52%)
Volume$351
Net Assets22.4M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and RFFC is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.1B vs. RFFC (22.4M). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than RFFC: RECS (15.482) vs RFFC (11.477). RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (6 years) vs RFFC (9 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover RFFC (33.00) vs RFFC (33.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 15.482 | 11.477 | 135% |
| Net Assets | 4.1B | 22.4M | 18,281% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.60 | 0.83 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 70% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.60% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.18% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been loosely correlated with SBGSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then SBGSY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.57% | ||
| ITOCY - RFFC | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.34% | ||
| NHYDY - RFFC | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| DUK - RFFC | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.89% | ||
| T - RFFC | 18% Poorly correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||