Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RECS vs RFFC
RECS vs RFFC Comparison
Open Charts RECS vs RFFC
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$41.37
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
Volume$784.6K
Net Assets4.98B
ALPS Active Equity Opportunity ETF
Price$69.14
Change+$0.65 (+0.95%)
Volume$23
Net Assets27.56M
RECS vs RFFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RECS vs. RFFC commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RECS is a Hold and RFFC is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 4.98B vs. RFFC (27.6M). RFFC has a higher annual dividend yield than RECS: RFFC (1.475) vs RECS (1.298). RECS was incepted earlier than RFFC: RECS (6 years) vs RFFC (10 years). RECS (0.15) has a lower expense ratio than RFFC (0.48). RECS has a higher turnover RFFC (33.00) vs RFFC (33.00).
| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 1.298 | 1.475 | 88% |
| Net Assets | 4.98B | 27.6M | 18,033% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| RECS | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 12 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +2.37% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.59% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | +1.83% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||
RFFC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been loosely correlated with SBGSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then SBGSY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| BKR - RFFC | 53% Loosely correlated | +4.04% | ||
| ITOCY - RFFC | 51% Loosely correlated | +1.39% | ||
| LIN - RFFC | 48% Loosely correlated | +0.01% | ||
More | ||||