| RECS | RFFC | RECS / RFFC | |
| Gain YTD | 19.324 | 16.975 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 4.78B | 27.1M | 17,635% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.15 | 0.48 | 31% |
| Turnover | 49.00 | 33.00 | 148% |
| Yield | 0.92 | 0.79 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
| RECS | RFFC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 19 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RSPF | 79.80 | 0.25 | +0.31% |
| Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Fincl ETF | |||
| BUFD | 28.38 | 0.07 | +0.25% |
| FT Vest Laddered Deep Buffer ETF | |||
| XYLG | 29.78 | 0.03 | +0.10% |
| Global X S&P 500® Covered Call & Gr ETF | |||
| FTIF | 22.55 | N/A | N/A |
| First Trust Bloomberg Infl Snstv Eq ETF | |||
| BPI | 30.34 | -0.13 | -0.42% |
| Grayscale Bitcoin Premium Income ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | +0.22% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 69% Closely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| CDNS - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.26% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 67% Closely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| CR - RECS | 66% Closely correlated | -0.38% | ||
| CRBG - RECS | 66% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RFFC has been loosely correlated with SBGSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RFFC jumps, then SBGSY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RFFC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RFFC | 100% | N/A | ||
| SBGSY - RFFC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| TT - RFFC | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| BKR - RFFC | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
| ITOCY - RFFC | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.63% | ||
| LIN - RFFC | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More | ||||