It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RDWR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRNG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RDWR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RNG’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
RDWR (@Packaged Software) experienced а +5.48% price change this week, while RNG (@Packaged Software) price change was -5.31% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
RDWR is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
RNG is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
RDWR | RNG | RDWR / RNG | |
Capitalization | 782M | 3.21B | 24% |
EBITDA | -19.44M | 113M | -17% |
Gain YTD | 40.707 | 8.218 | 495% |
P/E Ratio | 149.25 | N/A | - |
Revenue | 261M | 2.2B | 12% |
Total Cash | 331M | 222M | 149% |
Total Debt | 20.7M | 1.59B | 1% |
RDWR | RNG | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 67 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 95 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 25 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RNG's Valuation (89) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RDWR (94) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that RNG’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
RDWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as RNG (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that RDWR’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.
RDWR's SMR Rating (89) in the Computer Communications industry is in the same range as RNG (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that RDWR’s stock grew similarly to RNG’s over the last 12 months.
RNG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as RDWR (44) in the Computer Communications industry. This means that RNG’s stock grew similarly to RDWR’s over the last 12 months.
RDWR's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Computer Communications industry is significantly better than the same rating for RNG (100) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that RDWR’s stock grew significantly faster than RNG’s over the last 12 months.
RDWR | RNG | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% | 1 day ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago88% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago74% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 5 days ago83% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago83% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago75% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RDWR has been loosely correlated with NTCT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RDWR jumps, then NTCT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RDWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RDWR | 100% | -1.88% | ||
NTCT - RDWR | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.45% | ||
MLNK - RDWR | 38% Loosely correlated | -2.58% | ||
GUNGF - RDWR | 37% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
RNG - RDWR | 37% Loosely correlated | -3.16% | ||
RPD - RDWR | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RNG has been loosely correlated with SSNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RNG jumps, then SSNC could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RNG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RNG | 100% | -3.16% | ||
SSNC - RNG | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.83% | ||
ZM - RNG | 45% Loosely correlated | -2.83% | ||
ASAN - RNG | 43% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
SPNS - RNG | 43% Loosely correlated | +0.11% | ||
U - RNG | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
More |