Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGEBX
RDLCX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGEBX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$9.83
Change-$0.16 (-1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets313.08M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$84.68
Change-$1.32 (-1.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets338.91B
RDLCX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGEBX commentary
Dec 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 339B vs. RDLCX (313M). RDLCX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: RDLCX (19 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). RDLCX (1.90) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.08). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGEBX (32.00). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGEBX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.04 vs. RDLCX (4.50). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 30.20 vs. RDLCX (7.30).
| RDLCX | RGEBX | RDLCX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 1.08 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.90 | 1.08 | 176% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.469 | 20.381 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 313M | 339B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.50 | 6.04 | 74% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.69 | 66.16 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.30 | 30.20 | 24% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.50 | 95.23 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement