Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGAHX
RDLCX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGAHX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.55
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets308.94M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$86.76
Change+$0.18 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets336.3B
RDLCX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGAHX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a Hold and RGAHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 336B vs. RDLCX (309M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: RGAHX (0.45) vs RDLCX (0.00). RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: RDLCX (18 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGAHX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.73 vs. RDLCX (5.61). RGAHX return over 5 years is better than : 40.74 vs. RDLCX (1.93).
| RDLCX | RGAHX | RDLCX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.44 | 411% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.44 | 436% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.549 | 18.137 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 309M | 336B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.45 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.61 | 11.73 | 48% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.65 | 72.76 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.93 | 40.74 | 5% |
| Returns for 10 years | 19.07 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement