Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDLCX vs RGACX
RDLCX vs RGACX Comparison
Open Charts RDLCX vs RGACX
Columbia Disciplined Growth C
Price$10.14
Change+$0.09 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets299.46M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R3
Price$83.16
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
RDLCX vs RGACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDLCX vs. RGACX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDLCX is a Buy and RGACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGACX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. RDLCX (299M). RGACX pays higher dividends than RDLCX: RGACX (0.07) vs RDLCX (0.00). RDLCX was incepted earlier than RGACX: RDLCX (18 years) vs RGACX (23 years). RDLCX (1.92) is less costly to investors than RGACX (0.94). RDLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 68.00 vs. RGACX (25.00). RGACX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLCX: RGACX (250) vs RDLCX (2000). RGACX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.83 vs. RDLCX (9.40). RGACX return over 5 years is better than : 40.02 vs. RDLCX (1.10).
| RDLCX | RGACX | RDLCX / RGACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.81 | 0.94 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.989 | 15.516 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 299M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.07 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 17.83 | 53% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.79 | 58.53 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.10 | 40.02 | 3% |
| Returns for 10 years | 17.11 | 95.93 | 18% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement