RDGMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
XPRCF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Ad is loading...

RDGMF vs XPRCF

Header iconRDGMF vs XPRCF Comparison
Open Charts RDGMF vs XPRCFBanner chart's image
RIDGELINE MINERALS
Price$0.10
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$76K
CapitalizationN/A
XPLORE RES
Price$0.06
Change-$0.02 (-25.00%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
RDGMF vs XPRCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDGMF vs. XPRCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDGMF is a Hold and XPRCF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (RDGMF: $0.10 vs. XPRCF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: RDGMF and XPRCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDGMF: 108% vs. XPRCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RDGMF: $14.09M vs. XPRCF: $1.04M
RDGMF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $14.09M. XPRCF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $1.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDGMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXPRCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RDGMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XPRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XPRCF is a better buy in the long-term than RDGMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDGMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RDGMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

RDGMF (@Precious Metals) experienced а -1.47% price change this week, while XPRCF (@Precious Metals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -5.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.11%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-5.24% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDGMF($14.1M) has a higher market cap than XPRCF($1.04M). XPRCF YTD gains are higher at: 100.000 vs. RDGMF (14.522). XPRCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -196.44K vs. RDGMF (-941.15K). RDGMF has more cash in the bank: 416K vs. XPRCF (88.6K). RDGMF (0) and XPRCF (0) have equivalent revenues.
RDGMFXPRCFRDGMF / XPRCF
Capitalization14.1M1.04M1,362%
EBITDA-941.15K-196.44K479%
Gain YTD14.522100.00015%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash416K88.6K470%
Total Debt74.7KN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDGMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
RDGMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL248.05-5.43
-2.14%
Apple
SPY586.28-18.01
-2.98%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X100041.540000-6099.062500
-5.75%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA440.13-39.73
-8.28%
Tesla
GME28.55-2.71
-8.67%
GameStop Corp

RDGMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDGMF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDGMF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDGMF
1D Price
Change %
RDGMF100%
+2.08%
TORXF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
+6.01%
ISVLF - RDGMF
28%
Poorly correlated
-7.13%
WEXPF - RDGMF
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.18%
RIOFF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
OCGSF - RDGMF
25%
Poorly correlated
-10.70%
More

XPRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that XPRCF and WKGFF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that XPRCF and WKGFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XPRCF
1D Price
Change %
XPRCF100%
N/A
WKGFF - XPRCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDRRF - XPRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.41%
RDGMF - XPRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
MNDJF - XPRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
-4.14%
GGAZF - XPRCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+14.75%
More