RDEXF
Price
$0.09
Change
+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.43M
RGRNF
Price
$3.42
Change
+$0.19 (+5.88%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RDEXF vs RGRNF

Header iconRDEXF vs RGRNF Comparison
Open Charts RDEXF vs RGRNFBanner chart's image
Red Pine Exploration
Price$0.09
Change+$0.02 (+28.57%)
Volume$245.04K
Capitalization25.43M
Regis Resources NL
Price$3.42
Change+$0.19 (+5.88%)
Volume$6.76K
Capitalization2.52B
RDEXF vs RGRNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RDEXF vs. RGRNF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDEXF is a StrongBuy and RGRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RDEXF: $0.09 vs. RGRNF: $3.42)
Brand notoriety: RDEXF and RGRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RDEXF: 43% vs. RGRNF: 238%
Market capitalization -- RDEXF: $25.43M vs. RGRNF: $2.52B
RDEXF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $25.43M. RGRNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $94.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RDEXF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGRNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RDEXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGRNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the long-term than RDEXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RDEXF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGRNF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RDEXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGRNF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the short-term than RDEXF.

Price Growth

RDEXF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +23.51% price change this week, while RGRNF (@Precious Metals) price change was +10.68% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4862.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+4.88% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGRNF($2.52B) has a higher market cap than RDEXF($25.4M). RGRNF YTD gains are higher at: 122.801 vs. RDEXF (1.087).
RDEXFRGRNFRDEXF / RGRNF
Capitalization25.4M2.52B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.087122.8011%
P/E RatioN/A15.65-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash4.45MN/A-
Total Debt191KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RDEXF vs RGRNF: Fundamental Ratings
RDEXF
RGRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3486
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10030
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGRNF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDEXF (88). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew significantly faster than RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as RDEXF (56). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RDEXF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew significantly faster than RDEXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RDEXFRGRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
90%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RDEXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NPXYY18.420.04
+0.22%
Nippon Sanso Holdings Corp.
INIS0.07N/A
N/A
International Isotopes, Inc.
BGPBF23.35N/A
N/A
BTS Group AB
SHWGY3.47N/A
N/A
Shandong Weigao Group Medical Polymer Co., Ltd.
WSRIF0.19N/A
N/A
WESTERN STAR RES INC.

RDEXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RDEXF and BLTMF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RDEXF and BLTMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RDEXF
1D Price
Change %
RDEXF100%
+16.37%
BLTMF - RDEXF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PROBF - RDEXF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.21%
PREIF - RDEXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
RGRNF - RDEXF
4%
Poorly correlated
+5.72%
RIOFF - RDEXF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
More

RGRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGRNF and AUGG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGRNF and AUGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGRNF
1D Price
Change %
RGRNF100%
+5.72%
AUGG - RGRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
ORLA - RGRNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.99%
GORO - RGRNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+15.85%
PROBF - RGRNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+5.21%
RDEXF - RGRNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+16.37%
More