Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDCCX vs RWEBX
RDCCX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RWEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value C
Price$8.73
Change+$0.03 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets176.65M
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$66.32
Change+$0.27 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
RDCCX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RWEBX commentary
Oct 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Buy and RWEBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. RDCCX (177M). RWEBX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RWEBX (0.76) vs RDCCX (0.63). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: RDCCX (17 years) vs RWEBX (11 years). RDCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RWEBX (1.06). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RWEBX (29.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RWEBX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.29 vs. RDCCX (-4.07). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.88 vs. RDCCX (9.23).
| RDCCX | RWEBX | RDCCX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.06 | 168% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.06 | 185% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.262 | 9.079 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 177M | 207B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 0.76 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.07 | 3.29 | -124% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.64 | 38.78 | 40% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.23 | 45.88 | 20% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.45 | 73.45 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement