Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RDCCX vs RMEBX
RDCCX vs RMEBX Comparison
Open Charts RDCCX vs RMEBX
Columbia Disciplined Value C
Price$8.90
Change+$0.06 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets178.76M
American Funds American Mutual R2E
Price$62.83
Change+$0.31 (+0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets111.8B
RDCCX vs RMEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RDCCX vs. RMEBX commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RDCCX is a Buy and RMEBX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMEBX has more cash in the bank: 112B vs. RDCCX (179M). RMEBX pays higher dividends than RDCCX: RMEBX (1.03) vs RDCCX (0.62). RDCCX was incepted earlier than RMEBX: RDCCX (17 years) vs RMEBX (11 years). RDCCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than RMEBX (1.07). RDCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 60.00 vs. RMEBX (31.00). RMEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDCCX: RMEBX (250) vs RDCCX (2000). RMEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.38 vs. RDCCX (-5.92). RMEBX return over 5 years is better than : 51.74 vs. RDCCX (3.73).
| RDCCX | RMEBX | RDCCX / RMEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.78 | 1.07 | 166% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.07 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.014 | 14.812 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 179M | 112B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.62 | 1.03 | 60% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.92 | 5.38 | -110% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.22 | 26.56 | 27% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.73 | 51.74 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.40 | 87.74 | 2% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement