RCL
Price
$356.64
Change
-$6.58 (-1.81%)
Updated
Sep 2, 10:58 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
98.66B
58 days until earnings call
RGS
Price
$22.40
Change
+$0.25 (+1.13%)
Updated
Sep 2, 10:38 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
53.96M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCL vs RGS

Header iconRCL vs RGS Comparison
Open Charts RCL vs RGSBanner chart's image
Royal Caribbean Group
Price$356.64
Change-$6.58 (-1.81%)
Volume$300
Capitalization98.66B
Regis
Price$22.40
Change+$0.25 (+1.13%)
Volume$100
Capitalization53.96M
RCL vs RGS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCL vs. RGS commentary
Sep 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCL is a Buy and RGS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 02, 2025
Stock price -- (RCL: $363.22 vs. RGS: $22.15)
Brand notoriety: RCL: Notable vs. RGS: Not notable
RCL represents the Consumer Sundries, while RGS is part of the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCL: 81% vs. RGS: 49%
Market capitalization -- RCL: $98.66B vs. RGS: $53.96M
RCL [@Consumer Sundries] is valued at $98.66B. RGS’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $53.96M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Consumer Sundries] industry ranges from $181.46B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $27.4B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Consumer Sundries] industry is $18.66B. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCL’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileRGS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RCL’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • RGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, RCL is a better buy in the long-term than RGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both RCL and RGS are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

RCL (@Consumer Sundries) experienced а +5.38% price change this week, while RGS (@Personnel Services) price change was +11.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was +2.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.09%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

RCL is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Consumer Sundries (+2.15% weekly)

Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.

@Personnel Services (+1.44% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCL($98.7B) has a higher market cap than RGS($54M). RCL has higher P/E ratio than RGS: RCL (27.01) vs RGS (0.58). RCL YTD gains are higher at: 58.445 vs. RGS (-6.619). RCL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.62B vs. RGS (116M). RCL has more cash in the bank: 735M vs. RGS (13.3M). RGS has less debt than RCL: RGS (368M) vs RCL (19.7B). RCL has higher revenues than RGS: RCL (17.2B) vs RGS (199M).
RCLRGSRCL / RGS
Capitalization98.7B54M182,778%
EBITDA6.62B116M5,706%
Gain YTD58.445-6.619-883%
P/E Ratio27.010.584,617%
Revenue17.2B199M8,643%
Total Cash735M13.3M5,526%
Total Debt19.7B368M5,353%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCL vs RGS: Fundamental Ratings
RCL
RGS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
207
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
151
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1654
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RCL's Valuation (58) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as RGS (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew similarly to RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGS (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew significantly faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RGS's SMR Rating (7) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as RCL (20) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry. This means that RGS’s stock grew similarly to RCL’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's Price Growth Rating (1) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (51) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

RCL's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGS (54) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that RCL’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCLRGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 23 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RCL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XCNY26.33N/A
N/A
SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
ISMD38.97-0.01
-0.03%
Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF
BND73.80-0.09
-0.12%
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
PSFD35.67-0.11
-0.32%
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (January) ETF
DVYE29.75-0.24
-0.80%
iShares Emerging Markets Dividend ETF

RCL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCL has been closely correlated with CUK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RCL jumps, then CUK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCL
1D Price
Change %
RCL100%
-0.72%
CUK - RCL
86%
Closely correlated
-1.69%
CCL - RCL
85%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
NCLH - RCL
79%
Closely correlated
-2.17%
VIK - RCL
74%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
TNL - RCL
68%
Closely correlated
+0.85%
More

RGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGS and TRIP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGS and TRIP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGS
1D Price
Change %
RGS100%
+5.63%
TRIP - RGS
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.23%
BKNG - RGS
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
RCL - RGS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
TNL - RGS
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.85%
CCL - RGS
21%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
More