RCKHF
Price
$0.86
Change
+$0.01 (+1.18%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
90.85M
SHASF
Price
$0.16
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
117.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCKHF vs SHASF

Header iconRCKHF vs SHASF Comparison
Open Charts RCKHF vs SHASFBanner chart's image
Rockhopper Exploration
Price$0.86
Change+$0.01 (+1.18%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization90.85M
Shamaran Petroleum
Price$0.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$3K
Capitalization117.06M
RCKHF vs SHASF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RCKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCKHF vs. SHASF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCKHF is a StrongBuy and SHASF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RCKHF: $0.86 vs. SHASF: $0.16)
Brand notoriety: RCKHF and SHASF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCKHF: 49% vs. SHASF: 4%
Market capitalization -- RCKHF: $90.85M vs. SHASF: $117.06M
RCKHF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $90.85M. SHASF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $117.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCKHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSHASF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • RCKHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SHASF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHASF is a better buy in the long-term than RCKHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCKHF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHASF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCKHF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHASF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RCKHF is a better buy in the short-term than SHASF.

Price Growth

RCKHF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -3.32% price change this week, while SHASF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.81%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+1.28% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHASF($117M) has a higher market cap than RCKHF($90.8M). RCKHF has higher P/E ratio than SHASF: RCKHF (2.40) vs SHASF (1.21). RCKHF YTD gains are higher at: 160.606 vs. SHASF (94.431). SHASF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 199M vs. RCKHF (-3.37M). SHASF has more cash in the bank: 40.1M vs. RCKHF (4.82M). RCKHF has less debt than SHASF: RCKHF (1.13M) vs SHASF (275M). SHASF has higher revenues than RCKHF: SHASF (181M) vs RCKHF (839K).
RCKHFSHASFRCKHF / SHASF
Capitalization90.8M117M78%
EBITDA-3.37M199M-2%
Gain YTD160.60694.431170%
P/E Ratio2.401.21198%
Revenue839K181M0%
Total Cash4.82M40.1M12%
Total Debt1.13M275M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCKHF vs SHASF: Fundamental Ratings
RCKHF
SHASF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4696
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
415
SMR RATING
1..100
9121
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
257
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SHASF's Valuation (72) in the null industry is in the same range as RCKHF (88). This means that SHASF’s stock grew similarly to RCKHF’s over the last 12 months.

RCKHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as SHASF (15). This means that RCKHF’s stock grew similarly to SHASF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's SMR Rating (21) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCKHF (91). This means that SHASF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCKHF’s over the last 12 months.

RCKHF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SHASF (36). This means that RCKHF’s stock grew similarly to SHASF’s over the last 12 months.

SHASF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as RCKHF (25). This means that SHASF’s stock grew similarly to RCKHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCKHFSHASF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RCKHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHASF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSIOX28.170.22
+0.79%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Gr Insghts Instl
MNNAX60.930.40
+0.66%
Victory Munder Multi-Cap A
UIVNX12.940.08
+0.62%
MFS Intrinsic Value R2
TMPIX57.740.25
+0.43%
Touchstone Mid Cap Institutional
PHSYX62.410.20
+0.32%
Putnam Global Health Care Y

RCKHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCKHF and BNEFF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCKHF and BNEFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCKHF
1D Price
Change %
RCKHF100%
+0.82%
BNEFF - RCKHF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHASF - RCKHF
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
RECAF - RCKHF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.86%
QTEYF - RCKHF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PTRUF - RCKHF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHASF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHASF and STGAF have been poorly correlated (+15% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHASF and STGAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHASF
1D Price
Change %
SHASF100%
+1.36%
STGAF - SHASF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPND - SHASF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.31%
RCKHF - SHASF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.82%
SQZZF - SHASF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVFF - SHASF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More