Advertisement
RCIAF vs SMNUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCIAF is a Hold and SMNUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RCIAF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSMNUF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- RCIAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SMNUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RCIAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMNUF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- RCIAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
- SMNUF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
Price Growth
RCIAF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while SMNUF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was +1.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.36%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Telecommunications (+1.96% weekly)Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.
| RCIAF | SMNUF | RCIAF / SMNUF | |
| Capitalization | 19.3B | 2.25B | 856% |
| EBITDA | 9.01B | 6.69T | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 12.121 | -53.319 | -23% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.24 | 5.17 | 353% |
| Revenue | 20.8B | 12.98T | 0% |
| Total Cash | 6.96B | 824B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 45.4B | 50.78T | 0% |
RCIAF | SMNUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 37 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 58 | 18 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 41 | 88 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 2 | 29 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMNUF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (37). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
SMNUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (100). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
SMNUF's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCIAF (58). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
RCIAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNUF (88). This means that RCIAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.
SMNUF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RCIAF (93). This means that SMNUF’s stock grew similarly to RCIAF’s over the last 12 months.
| RCIAF | SMNUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 49% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 13% | 4 days ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% | 4 days ago 35% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 26% | 4 days ago 36% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 23% | 4 days ago 43% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FDGRX | 44.82 | -0.04 | -0.09% |
| Fidelity Growth Company Fund | |||
| FDTIX | 41.07 | -0.13 | -0.32% |
| Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock I | |||
| ICSAX | 12.25 | -0.07 | -0.57% |
| VY® Columbia Small Cap Value II A | |||
| CVFCX | 16.06 | -0.10 | -0.62% |
| Victory Pioneer Disciplined Value A | |||
| LMCSX | 32.81 | -0.23 | -0.70% |
| Lord Abbett Mid Cap Stock R4 | |||
RCIAF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RCIAF has been loosely correlated with TLSNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RCIAF jumps, then TLSNF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCIAF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCIAF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TLSNF - RCIAF | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BTGOF - RCIAF | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.18% | ||
| QBCAF - RCIAF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QBCRF - RCIAF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SMNUF - RCIAF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
SMNUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMNUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMNUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| TCMFF - SMNUF | 41% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| SFTBF - SMNUF | 11% Poorly correlated | +2.00% | ||
| SFTBY - SMNUF | 10% Poorly correlated | +6.46% | ||
| SWZCF - SMNUF | 9% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
| QBCRF - SMNUF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||