Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RCGTX vs SLMCX
RCGTX vs SLMCX Comparison
Open Charts RCGTX vs SLMCX
Virtus Zevenbergen Technology C
Price$13.83
Change-$3.41 (-19.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.66B
Columbia Seligman Tech & Info A
Price$172.98
Change+$8.12 (+4.93%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.49B
RCGTX vs SLMCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RCGTX vs. SLMCX commentary
Feb 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGTX is a Hold and SLMCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLMCX has more cash in the bank: 20.5B vs. RCGTX (1.66B). RCGTX (0.00) and SLMCX (0.00) have matching dividends . RCGTX was incepted earlier than SLMCX: RCGTX (24 years) vs SLMCX (43 years). RCGTX (2.17) is less costly to investors than SLMCX (1.16). SLMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. RCGTX (2.00). SLMCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCGTX: SLMCX (2000) vs RCGTX (2500). SLMCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.44 vs. RCGTX (-0.79). SLMCX return over 5 years is better than : 51.76 vs. RCGTX (-69.96).
| RCGTX | SLMCX | RCGTX / SLMCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.16 | 187% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.17 | 1.16 | 187% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.399 | 10.389 | -23% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 2000 | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.66B | 20.5B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.79 | 36.44 | -2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 87.14 | 82.72 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | -69.96 | 51.76 | -135% |
| Returns for 10 years | -62.17 | 257.77 | -24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers