RCGCF
Price
$0.12
Change
+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
52.06M
RGRNF
Price
$4.09
Change
-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RCGCF vs RGRNF

Header iconRCGCF vs RGRNF Comparison
Open Charts RCGCF vs RGRNFBanner chart's image
ROSCAN GOLD
Price$0.12
Change+$0.02 (+20.00%)
Volume$576.14K
Capitalization52.06M
Regis Resources NL
Price$4.09
Change-$0.01 (-0.24%)
Volume$1.65K
Capitalization2.92B
RCGCF vs RGRNF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RCGCF vs. RGRNF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCGCF is a StrongBuy and RGRNF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (RCGCF: $0.10 vs. RGRNF: $4.10)
Brand notoriety: RCGCF and RGRNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RCGCF: 462% vs. RGRNF: 24%
Market capitalization -- RCGCF: $47.52M vs. RGRNF: $2.91B
RCGCF [@Precious Metals] is valued at $47.52M. RGRNF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $2.91B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $102.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RCGCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGRNF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RCGCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGRNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the long-term than RCGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RCGCF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGRNF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RCGCF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RGRNF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGRNF is a better buy in the short-term than RCGCF.

Price Growth

RCGCF (@Precious Metals) experienced а +46.76% price change this week, while RGRNF (@Precious Metals) price change was +18.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.52%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6008.39%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.52% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGRNF($2.92B) has a higher market cap than RCGCF($52.1M). RCGCF YTD gains are higher at: 179.707 vs. RGRNF (166.450). RGRNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 784M vs. RCGCF (-2.66M). RGRNF has more cash in the bank: 505M vs. RCGCF (67.6K). RCGCF has less debt than RGRNF: RCGCF (1.29M) vs RGRNF (119M). RGRNF has higher revenues than RCGCF: RGRNF (1.65B) vs RCGCF (0).
RCGCFRGRNFRCGCF / RGRNF
Capitalization52.1M2.92B2%
EBITDA-2.66M784M-0%
Gain YTD179.707166.450108%
P/E RatioN/A18.59-
Revenue01.65B-
Total Cash67.6K505M0%
Total Debt1.29M119M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RCGCF vs RGRNF: Fundamental Ratings
RCGCF
RGRNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2479
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10054
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3637
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10016
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGRNF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCGCF (85). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RCGCF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew similarly to RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RCGCF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

RCGCF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RGRNF (37). This means that RCGCF’s stock grew similarly to RGRNF’s over the last 12 months.

RGRNF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RCGCF (100). This means that RGRNF’s stock grew significantly faster than RCGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RCGCFRGRNF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
86%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RCGCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGRNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CFPZF8.850.10
+1.14%
Canfor Corp.
AHODF39.46N/A
N/A
Koninklijke Ahold Delhaize N.V.
SEPJF54.88N/A
N/A
Spectris Plc.
UNIB16.25N/A
N/A
University Bancorp, Inc.
LODFF0.17N/A
N/A
Lode Gold Resources Inc.

RCGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RCGCF and TORXF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCGCF and TORXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RCGCF
1D Price
Change %
RCGCF100%
+14.62%
TORXF - RCGCF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.82%
STLRF - RCGCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+4.08%
RIOFF - RCGCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+11.54%
PROBF - RCGCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
RGRNF - RCGCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
More

RGRNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RGRNF and AUGG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RGRNF and AUGG's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGRNF
1D Price
Change %
RGRNF100%
-0.24%
AUGG - RGRNF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ORLA - RGRNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
GORO - RGRNF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.51%
PROBF - RGRNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.44%
RDEXF - RGRNF
4%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
More