RCDTF vs RHHBY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RCDTF is a Hold and RHHBY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RCDTF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRHHBY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- RCDTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RHHBY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Price Growth
RCDTF (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RHHBY (@Pharmaceuticals: Major) price change was -5.32% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Major industry was -4.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
RHHBY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Major (-4.39% weekly)The Major Pharmaceuticals industry includes companies that are involved in various processes of creating drugs to treat/prevent diseases. These companies engage in research, testing and manufacturing, as well as the distribution of pharmaceuticals into markets. Johnson & Johnson, Merck & Co., Inc., Pfizer Inc. and Novartis are among the largest companies in this category.
| RCDTF | RHHBY | RCDTF / RHHBY | |
| Capitalization | 10.6B | 251B | 4% |
| EBITDA | 615M | 19.1B | 3% |
| Gain YTD | 13.587 | 3.847 | 353% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.11 | 19.46 | 134% |
| Revenue | 1.99B | 60B | 3% |
| Total Cash | 231M | 7.51B | 3% |
| Total Debt | 1.58B | 25.4B | 6% |
RCDTF | RHHBY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 20 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 49 | 71 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 44 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 45 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 48 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RHHBY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (20). This means that RHHBY’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.
RCDTF's Profit vs Risk Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBY (71). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBY’s over the last 12 months.
RCDTF's SMR Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RHHBY (98). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RHHBY’s over the last 12 months.
RCDTF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as RHHBY (56). This means that RCDTF’s stock grew similarly to RHHBY’s over the last 12 months.
RHHBY's P/E Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as RCDTF (64). This means that RHHBY’s stock grew similarly to RCDTF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
RCDTF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RCDTF and RHHBF have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RCDTF and RHHBF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RCDTF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCDTF | 100% | N/A | ||
| RHHBF - RCDTF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.34% | ||
| RHHBY - RCDTF | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
| PTKFY - RCDTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PTKFF - RCDTF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNPHY - RCDTF | -0% Poorly correlated | -0.19% | ||
More | ||||
RHHBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RHHBY has been loosely correlated with RHHVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RHHBY jumps, then RHHVF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RHHBY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RHHBY | 100% | -2.38% | ||
| RHHVF - RHHBY | 66% Loosely correlated | -1.96% | ||
| RHHBF - RHHBY | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.34% | ||
| ABBV - RHHBY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.42% | ||
| JNJ - RHHBY | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.89% | ||
| CHGCY - RHHBY | 20% Poorly correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||