Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBVAX vs SSGSX
RBVAX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts RBVAX vs SSGSX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
RBVAX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. RBVAX (4.36M). RBVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: RBVAX (0.75) vs SSGSX (0.47). RBVAX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: RBVAX (5 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). RBVAX (33.11) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). RBVAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). RBVAX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. RBVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: RBVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). RBVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.34 vs. SSGSX (-1.56).
| RBVAX | SSGSX | RBVAX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.11 | 1.26 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 33.11 | 1.26 | 2,628% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.640 | 2.046 | -31% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.36M | 5.64B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.75 | 0.47 | 159% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.34 | -1.56 | -86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.20 | 3.97 | 685% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 22.95 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 24.71 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement