RBTK
Price
$1.68
Change
-$0.32 (-16.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
185.49M
SMAGF
Price
$0.97
Change
+$0.01 (+1.04%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
90.37M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBTK vs SMAGF

Header iconRBTK vs SMAGF Comparison
Open Charts RBTK vs SMAGFBanner chart's image
Zhen Ding Resources
Price$1.68
Change-$0.32 (-16.00%)
Volume$200
Capitalization185.49M
Soma Gold
Price$0.97
Change+$0.01 (+1.04%)
Volume$62.14K
Capitalization90.37M
RBTK vs SMAGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RBTK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBTK vs. SMAGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBTK is a Hold and SMAGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RBTK: $1.68 vs. SMAGF: $0.97)
Brand notoriety: RBTK and SMAGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBTK: 24% vs. SMAGF: 114%
Market capitalization -- RBTK: $185.49M vs. SMAGF: $90.37M
RBTK [@Precious Metals] is valued at $185.49M. SMAGF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $90.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $89.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $2.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBTK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMAGF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RBTK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMAGF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the long-term than RBTK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBTK’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMAGF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RBTK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMAGF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMAGF is a better buy in the short-term than RBTK.

Price Growth

RBTK (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.00% price change this week, while SMAGF (@Precious Metals) price change was -5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +3.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.34%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4956.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+3.81% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBTK($185M) has a higher market cap than SMAGF($90.4M). SMAGF YTD gains are higher at: 160.753 vs. RBTK (-22.936). SMAGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.6M vs. RBTK (275K). SMAGF has more cash in the bank: 7.53M vs. RBTK (18.4K). RBTK has less debt than SMAGF: RBTK (3.43M) vs SMAGF (32.9M). SMAGF has higher revenues than RBTK: SMAGF (97.9M) vs RBTK (0).
RBTKSMAGFRBTK / SMAGF
Capitalization185M90.4M205%
EBITDA275K39.6M1%
Gain YTD-22.936160.753-14%
P/E RatioN/A19.10-
Revenue097.9M-
Total Cash18.4K7.53M0%
Total Debt3.43M32.9M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBTK vs SMAGF: Fundamental Ratings
RBTK
SMAGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3014
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10019
SMR RATING
1..100
9723
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5036
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBTK's Valuation (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMAGF (73). This means that RBTK’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMAGF’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBTK (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's SMR Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RBTK (97). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew significantly faster than RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTK (50). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

SMAGF's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RBTK (100). This means that SMAGF’s stock grew similarly to RBTK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBTKSMAGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
76%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBTK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMAGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SBGSY50.710.12
+0.25%
Schneider Electric SE
GXSBY0.68N/A
N/A
Geox Spa Biadene di Montebelluna Tv
JCYCF21.21N/A
N/A
Jardine Cycle & Carriage Limited
KTHGF0.03N/A
N/A
Kantone Holdings Ltd.
LNDAF1.58N/A
N/A
LINEA DIRECTA ASEGURADORA SA

RBTK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBTK and GALKF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBTK and GALKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBTK
1D Price
Change %
RBTK100%
-16.00%
GALKF - RBTK
10%
Poorly correlated
+8.99%
FTCO - RBTK
-1%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
MAKAF - RBTK
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.89%
GROY - RBTK
-1%
Poorly correlated
-4.51%
SMAGF - RBTK
-3%
Poorly correlated
+0.94%
More

SMAGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMAGF has been loosely correlated with TORXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMAGF jumps, then TORXF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMAGF
1D Price
Change %
SMAGF100%
+0.94%
TORXF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
STLRF - SMAGF
35%
Loosely correlated
-5.28%
PROBF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-4.24%
LOMLF - SMAGF
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
SNWGF - SMAGF
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.84%
More