RBLAY
Price
$5.95
Change
-$0.10 (-1.65%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
SUHJF
Price
$11.13
Change
-$0.68 (-5.75%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
36.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBLAY vs SUHJF

Header iconRBLAY vs SUHJF Comparison
Open Charts RBLAY vs SUHJFBanner chart's image
Robinsons Land
Price$5.95
Change-$0.10 (-1.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.34B
Sun Hung Kai Properties
Price$11.13
Change-$0.68 (-5.75%)
Volume$3.98K
Capitalization36.26B
RBLAY vs SUHJF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RBLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUHJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBLAY vs. SUHJF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBLAY is a Hold and SUHJF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RBLAY: $5.48 vs. SUHJF: $11.14)
Brand notoriety: RBLAY and SUHJF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBLAY: 100% vs. SUHJF: 29%
Market capitalization -- RBLAY: $1.34B vs. SUHJF: $36.26B
RBLAY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.34B. SUHJF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $36.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBLAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSUHJF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RBLAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SUHJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SUHJF is a better buy in the long-term than RBLAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBLAY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUHJF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RBLAY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • SUHJF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RBLAY is a better buy in the short-term than SUHJF.

Price Growth

RBLAY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUHJF (@Real Estate Development) price change was -5.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUHJF($36.3B) has a higher market cap than RBLAY($1.34B). SUHJF has higher P/E ratio than RBLAY: SUHJF (15.11) vs RBLAY (13.51). SUHJF YTD gains are higher at: 16.111 vs. RBLAY (-3.703). SUHJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 25.8B vs. RBLAY (20.7B). SUHJF has more cash in the bank: 18.5B vs. RBLAY (6.48B). RBLAY has less debt than SUHJF: RBLAY (53.5B) vs SUHJF (133B). SUHJF has higher revenues than RBLAY: SUHJF (65B) vs RBLAY (48.1B).
RBLAYSUHJFRBLAY / SUHJF
Capitalization1.34B36.3B4%
EBITDA20.7B25.8B80%
Gain YTD-3.70316.111-23%
P/E Ratio13.5115.1189%
Revenue48.1B65B74%
Total Cash6.48B18.5B35%
Total Debt53.5B133B40%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBLAY vs SUHJF: Fundamental Ratings
RBLAY
SUHJF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97100
SMR RATING
1..100
73100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7643
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6511
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SUHJF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as RBLAY (32). This means that SUHJF’s stock grew similarly to RBLAY’s over the last 12 months.

RBLAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SUHJF (100). This means that RBLAY’s stock grew similarly to SUHJF’s over the last 12 months.

RBLAY's SMR Rating (73) in the null industry is in the same range as SUHJF (100). This means that RBLAY’s stock grew similarly to SUHJF’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBLAY (76). This means that SUHJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBLAY’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJF's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RBLAY (65). This means that SUHJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RBLAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBLAYSUHJF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
31%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
43%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUHJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JSCZX16.460.14
+0.86%
JPMorgan US Small Company R2
TWDAX18.590.11
+0.60%
Templeton World Adv
ARIDX6.240.03
+0.48%
AMG River Road Dividend All Cap Value I
MINGX42.180.17
+0.40%
MFS International Intrinsic Value R3
PPAEX20.800.07
+0.34%
GMO U.S. Opportunistic Value I

RBLAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBLAY has been loosely correlated with LPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBLAY jumps, then LPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBLAY
1D Price
Change %
RBLAY100%
N/A
LPA - RBLAY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
SUHJF - RBLAY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPHXF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIUDF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOHOF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
-29.87%
More

SUHJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SUHJF and AXR have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SUHJF and AXR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUHJF
1D Price
Change %
SUHJF100%
N/A
AXR - SUHJF
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
WRFRF - SUHJF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUHJY - SUHJF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SOHOF - SUHJF
7%
Poorly correlated
-29.87%
RBLAY - SUHJF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More