RBLAY
Price
$5.95
Change
-$0.10 (-1.65%)
Updated
Mar 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.34B
SIUDF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
May 28 closing price
Capitalization
276.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBLAY vs SIUDF

Header iconRBLAY vs SIUDF Comparison
Open Charts RBLAY vs SIUDFBanner chart's image
Robinsons Land
Price$5.95
Change-$0.10 (-1.65%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.34B
Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$800
Capitalization276.43M
RBLAY vs SIUDF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
RBLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBLAY vs. SIUDF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBLAY is a Hold and SIUDF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (RBLAY: $5.48 vs. SIUDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RBLAY and SIUDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBLAY: 100% vs. SIUDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RBLAY: $1.34B vs. SIUDF: $276.43M
RBLAY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.34B. SIUDF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $276.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBLAY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSIUDF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • RBLAY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SIUDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RBLAY and SIUDF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBLAY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RBLAY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.

Price Growth

RBLAY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIUDF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.96%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.35% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBLAY($1.34B) has a higher market cap than SIUDF($276M). RBLAY has higher P/E ratio than SIUDF: RBLAY (13.51) vs SIUDF (5.33). SIUDF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. RBLAY (-3.703). RBLAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. SIUDF (3.52B). SIUDF has more cash in the bank: 8.81B vs. RBLAY (6.48B). SIUDF has less debt than RBLAY: SIUDF (20.3B) vs RBLAY (53.5B). RBLAY has higher revenues than SIUDF: RBLAY (48.1B) vs SIUDF (13.2B).
RBLAYSIUDFRBLAY / SIUDF
Capitalization1.34B276M486%
EBITDA20.7B3.52B588%
Gain YTD-3.7030.000-
P/E Ratio13.515.33254%
Revenue48.1B13.2B364%
Total Cash6.48B8.81B74%
Total Debt53.5B20.3B264%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBLAY: Fundamental Ratings
RBLAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
73
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
76
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBLAYSIUDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
9%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
8%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBLAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMCCX15.860.21
+1.34%
Columbia Select Mid Cap Gro Fd C
GGRAX11.280.13
+1.17%
Goldman Sachs Strategic Growth A
NQCAX5.400.05
+0.93%
Nuveen Large Cap Value Opportunities A
RSCRX25.470.20
+0.79%
Russell Inv US Small Cap Equity R6
FOSKX74.440.26
+0.35%
Fidelity Overseas K

RBLAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBLAY has been loosely correlated with LPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBLAY jumps, then LPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBLAY
1D Price
Change %
RBLAY100%
N/A
LPA - RBLAY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
SUHJF - RBLAY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPHXF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIUDF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOHOF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
-29.87%
More

SIUDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIUDF and ABCP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIUDF and ABCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIUDF
1D Price
Change %
SIUDF100%
N/A
ABCP - SIUDF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - SIUDF
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
CRBJY - SIUDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBLAY - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More