Ad is loading...
RBLAY
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
SIUDF
Price
Loading...
Change
Loading...
Updated
Loading...
Ad is loading...

RBLAY vs SIUDF

Header iconRBLAY vs SIUDF Comparison
Open Charts RBLAY vs SIUDFBanner chart's image
Robinsons Land
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
Shanghai Industrial Urban Development Group
PriceLoading...
ChangeLoading...
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
RBLAY vs SIUDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBLAY vs. SIUDF commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBLAY is a Hold and SIUDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (RBLAY: $5.73 vs. SIUDF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: RBLAY and SIUDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBLAY: 100% vs. SIUDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- RBLAY: $1.34B vs. SIUDF: $276.43M
RBLAY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $1.34B. SIUDF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $276.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.32B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBLAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSIUDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • RBLAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SIUDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SIUDF is a better buy in the long-term than RBLAY.

Price Growth

RBLAY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SIUDF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -1.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (-1.07% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBLAY($1.34B) has a higher market cap than SIUDF($276M). RBLAY has higher P/E ratio than SIUDF: RBLAY (13.51) vs SIUDF (5.33). SIUDF YTD gains are higher at: 33.600 vs. RBLAY (4.327). RBLAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.7B vs. SIUDF (3.52B). SIUDF has more cash in the bank: 8.81B vs. RBLAY (6.48B). SIUDF has less debt than RBLAY: SIUDF (20.3B) vs RBLAY (53.5B). RBLAY has higher revenues than SIUDF: RBLAY (48.1B) vs SIUDF (13.2B).
RBLAYSIUDFRBLAY / SIUDF
Capitalization1.34B276M486%
EBITDA20.7B3.52B588%
Gain YTD4.32733.60013%
P/E Ratio13.515.33254%
Revenue48.1B13.2B364%
Total Cash6.48B8.81B74%
Total Debt53.5B20.3B264%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBLAY: Fundamental Ratings
RBLAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
37
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
74
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
55
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
75
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME28.450.88
+3.19%
GameStop Corp
BTC.X94339.4900001995.703100
+2.16%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
AAPL229.000.72
+0.32%
Apple
SPY590.500.20
+0.03%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA342.03-3.97
-1.15%
Tesla

RBLAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBLAY has been loosely correlated with LPA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBLAY jumps, then LPA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBLAY
1D Price
Change %
RBLAY100%
N/A
LPA - RBLAY
34%
Loosely correlated
-4.06%
SUHJF - RBLAY
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.86%
SPHXF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIUDF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOHOF - RBLAY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SIUDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SIUDF and ABCP have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SIUDF and ABCP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SIUDF
1D Price
Change %
SIUDF100%
N/A
ABCP - SIUDF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UK - SIUDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.06%
CRBJY - SIUDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PSPSF - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBLAY - SIUDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More