RBGLY
Price
$13.89
Change
-$0.25 (-1.77%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
53.84B
39 days until earnings call
RBGPF
Price
$70.02
Change
+$1.76 (+2.58%)
Updated
Jun 12 closing price
Capitalization
53.84B
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBGLY vs RBGPF

Header iconRBGLY vs RBGPF Comparison
Open Charts RBGLY vs RBGPFBanner chart's image
Reckitt Benckiser Group
Price$13.89
Change-$0.25 (-1.77%)
Volume$245.44K
Capitalization53.84B
Reckitt Benckiser Group
Price$70.02
Change+$1.76 (+2.58%)
Volume$1.57K
Capitalization53.84B
RBGLY vs RBGPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
RBGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBGLY vs. RBGPF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBGLY is a Hold and RBGPF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (RBGLY: $13.89 vs. RBGPF: $70.02)
Brand notoriety: RBGLY and RBGPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBGLY: 58% vs. RBGPF: 73%
Market capitalization -- RBGLY: $53.84B vs. RBGPF: $53.84B
RBGLY [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $53.84B. RBGPF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $53.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBGLY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRBGPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RBGLY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RBGPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both RBGLY and RBGPF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBGLY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • RBGLY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

RBGLY (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RBGPF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +1.42% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was -1.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.88%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBGLY is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (-1.71% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBGLY($53.8B) and RBGPF($53.8B) have the same market capitalization . RBGLY (18.69) and RBGPF (18.48) have similar P/E ratio . RBGPF (18.635) and RBGLY (18.483) have similar YTD gains . RBGLY (3.9B) and RBGPF (3.9B) have comparable annual earnings (EBITDA) . RBGLY (1.03B) and RBGPF (1.03B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RBGLY (8.64B) and RBGPF (8.64B) have identical debt. RBGLY (15B) and RBGPF (15B) have equivalent revenues.
RBGLYRBGPFRBGLY / RBGPF
Capitalization53.8B53.8B100%
EBITDA3.9B3.9B100%
Gain YTD18.48318.63599%
P/E Ratio18.6918.48101%
Revenue15B15B100%
Total Cash1.03B1.03B100%
Total Debt8.64B8.64B100%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBGLY vs RBGPF: Fundamental Ratings
RBGLY
RBGPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9494
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RBGLY's Valuation (23) in the null industry is in the same range as RBGPF (24). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to RBGPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBGLY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as RBGPF (100). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to RBGPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBGLY's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as RBGPF (94). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to RBGPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBGLY's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as RBGPF (44). This means that RBGLY’s stock grew similarly to RBGPF’s over the last 12 months.

RBGPF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as RBGLY (22). This means that RBGPF’s stock grew similarly to RBGLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBGLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBGLY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LMPPX35.78-0.37
-1.02%
ClearBridge Appreciation R
JDPRX15.29-0.20
-1.29%
Janus Henderson Mid Cap Value R
STCZX15.98-0.23
-1.42%
Virtus Silvant Large-Cap Growth Stk R6
TGCNX23.86-0.42
-1.73%
TCW Concentrated Large Cap Growth N Cl
UDPSX61.69-2.30
-3.59%
ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 Svc

RBGLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBGLY and UL have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBGLY and UL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBGLY
1D Price
Change %
RBGLY100%
-1.77%
UL - RBGLY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
KMB - RBGLY
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.28%
IPAR - RBGLY
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.28%
SPCO - RBGLY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RBGPF - RBGLY
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RBGPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RBGPF and PGID have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RBGPF and PGID's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBGPF
1D Price
Change %
RBGPF100%
N/A
PGID - RBGPF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNCHF - RBGPF
19%
Poorly correlated
-10.26%
RBGLY - RBGPF
14%
Poorly correlated
-1.77%
UNICY - RBGPF
10%
Poorly correlated
-2.21%
PURE - RBGPF
8%
Poorly correlated
-12.63%
More