Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBEMX vs TRRNX
RBEMX vs TRRNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBEMX vs. TRRNX commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBEMX is a Hold and TRRNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBEMX has more cash in the bank: 26.2B vs. TRRNX (10.7B). TRRNX pays higher dividends than RBEMX: TRRNX (1.24) vs RBEMX (0.47). RBEMX was incepted earlier than TRRNX: RBEMX (11 years) vs TRRNX (18 years). RBEMX (1.19) is less costly to investors than TRRNX (0.64). TRRNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.60 vs. RBEMX (5.00). RBEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRRNX: RBEMX (250) vs TRRNX (2500). TRRNX (10.73) and RBEMX (10.21) have marching annual gain over last year. TRRNX return over 5 years is better than : 44.73 vs. RBEMX (42.23).
| RBEMX | TRRNX | RBEMX / TRRNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.64 | 186% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.19 | 0.64 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.235 | 6.285 | 115% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 26.2B | 10.7B | 245% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.24 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.21 | 10.73 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.80 | 40.23 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.23 | 44.73 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 70.32 | 64.50 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement