Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBCRX vs TRCLX
RBCRX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts RBCRX vs TRCLX
RBC China Equity R6
Price$12.58
Change-$0.12 (-0.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6.62M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$13.63
Change-$0.30 (-2.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets61.84M
RBCRX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBCRX vs. TRCLX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBCRX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 61.8M vs. RBCRX (6.62M). RBCRX (1.35) and TRCLX (1.34) have matching dividends . RBCRX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: RBCRX (4 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (2.10). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. TRCLX (82.40). RBCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: RBCRX (250000) vs TRCLX (500000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.15 vs. TRCLX (27.19).
| RBCRX | TRCLX | RBCRX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.03 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 2.10 | 321% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 48.000 | 29.072 | 165% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 500000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.62M | 61.8M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.35 | 1.34 | 101% |
| Returns for 1 year | 42.15 | 27.19 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 60.84 | 32.10 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -3.01 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 31.88 | N/A | - |