Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBCRX vs TRCLX
RBCRX vs TRCLX Comparison
Open Charts RBCRX vs TRCLX
RBC China Equity R6
Price$13.07
Change-$0.01 (-0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.04M
T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity I
Price$15.57
Change+$1.40 (+9.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets66.94M
RBCRX vs TRCLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBCRX vs. TRCLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBCRX is a Hold and TRCLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TRCLX has more cash in the bank: 66.9M vs. RBCRX (7.04M). RBCRX pays higher dividends than TRCLX: RBCRX (3.32) vs TRCLX (1.49). RBCRX was incepted earlier than TRCLX: RBCRX (4 years) vs TRCLX (6 years). RBCRX (6.74) is less costly to investors than TRCLX (1.73). RBCRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. TRCLX (104.10). RBCRX has a lower initial minimum investment than TRCLX: RBCRX (250000) vs TRCLX (500000). RBCRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 55.55 vs. TRCLX (50.04).
| RBCRX | TRCLX | RBCRX / TRCLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 1.03 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 6.74 | 1.73 | 390% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.744 | 10.035 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250000 | 500000 | 50% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 7.04M | 66.9M | 11% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.32 | 1.49 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 55.55 | 50.04 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.93 | 28.71 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | -9.00 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.09 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement