Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
RBBCX vs SCUPX
RBBCX vs SCUPX Comparison
Open Charts RBBCX vs SCUPX
Columbia Income Builder C
Price$12.28
Change-$0.02 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets850.6M
Principal SAM Flexible Income C
Price$12.65
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.24B
RBBCX vs SCUPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
RBBCX vs. SCUPX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBBCX is a Hold and SCUPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCUPX has more cash in the bank: 2.24B vs. RBBCX (851M). RBBCX pays higher dividends than SCUPX: RBBCX (2.99) vs SCUPX (1.98). RBBCX was incepted earlier than SCUPX: RBBCX (20 years) vs SCUPX (24 years). SCUPX (1.80) and RBBCX (1.72) have similar cost to investors . SCUPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 19.80 vs. RBBCX (18.00). SCUPX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBBCX: SCUPX (1000) vs RBBCX (2000). RBBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.58 vs. SCUPX (5.14). RBBCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.82 vs. SCUPX (11.38).
| RBBCX | SCUPX | RBBCX / SCUPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.80 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.72 | 1.80 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.307 | 7.286 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000 | 200% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 1000 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 851M | 2.24B | 38% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.99 | 1.98 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.58 | 5.14 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.49 | 26.15 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.82 | 11.38 | 130% |
| Returns for 10 years | 44.80 | 27.03 | 166% |