RBA
Price
$115.35
Change
+$0.68 (+0.59%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:13 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.23B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
ULS
Price
$70.57
Change
-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Updated
Feb 4, 03:25 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.2B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

RBA vs ULS

Header iconRBA vs ULS Comparison
Open Charts RBA vs ULSBanner chart's image
RB Global
Price$115.35
Change+$0.68 (+0.59%)
Volume$800
Capitalization21.23B
UL Solutions
Price$70.57
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Volume$3.04K
Capitalization14.2B
RBA vs ULS Comparison Chart in %
RBA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
RBA vs. ULS commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is RBA is a Hold and ULS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (RBA: $114.67 vs. ULS: $70.62)
Brand notoriety: RBA and ULS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Office Equipment/Supplies industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: RBA: 86% vs. ULS: 93%
Market capitalization -- RBA: $21.23B vs. ULS: $14.2B
RBA [@Office Equipment/Supplies] is valued at $21.23B. ULS’s [@Office Equipment/Supplies] market capitalization is $14.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry ranges from $89.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Office Equipment/Supplies] industry is $6.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

RBA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileULS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • RBA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ULS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RBA is a better buy in the long-term than ULS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

RBA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ULS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • RBA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • ULS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ULS is a better buy in the short-term than RBA.

Price Growth

RBA (@Office Equipment/Supplies) experienced а -2.33% price change this week, while ULS (@Office Equipment/Supplies) price change was -2.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Office Equipment/Supplies industry was -1.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.83%.

Reported Earning Dates

RBA is expected to report earnings on Feb 17, 2026.

ULS is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Office Equipment/Supplies (-1.48% weekly)

The industry produces equipment regularly used in offices by businesses and other organizations, and could range from items like Blank sheet paper, calendars, Label and adhesive paper, paper clips, janitorial supplies, to larger /higher cost products like computers, printers, photocopiers, office furniture and so on. Many businesses in the office supply industry have been expanding into related markets like business cards, plus printing and binding of high quality, high volume business and engineering documents. Some companies in this industry also offer shipping services, including packaging and bulk mailing. Herman Miller, Inc., Steelcase Inc. and HNI Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBA($21.2B) has a higher market cap than ULS($14.2B). RBA has higher P/E ratio than ULS: RBA (54.60) vs ULS (42.29). RBA YTD gains are higher at: 11.471 vs. ULS (-10.449). RBA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39B vs. ULS (686M). RBA has more cash in the bank: 675M vs. ULS (255M). ULS has less debt than RBA: ULS (736M) vs RBA (4.25B). RBA has higher revenues than ULS: RBA (4.53B) vs ULS (3B).
RBAULSRBA / ULS
Capitalization21.2B14.2B149%
EBITDA1.39B686M202%
Gain YTD11.471-10.449-110%
P/E Ratio54.6042.29129%
Revenue4.53B3B151%
Total Cash675M255M265%
Total Debt4.25B736M577%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
RBA: Fundamental Ratings
RBA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
21
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
20
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
46
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
44

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RBAULS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
50%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
RBA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
ULS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IWMI50.560.09
+0.18%
NEOS Russell 2000 High Income ETF
FFGX32.37N/A
+0.01%
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
FLEU34.88N/A
N/A
Franklin FTSE Eurozone ETF
IBDX25.47-0.01
-0.04%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF
HYFI37.66-0.02
-0.06%
AB High Yield ETF

RBA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RBA has been loosely correlated with PRSU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RBA jumps, then PRSU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RBA
1D Price
Change %
RBA100%
+0.40%
PRSU - RBA
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
AZZ - RBA
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
MSA - RBA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.63%
CTAS - RBA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
ARMK - RBA
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
More

ULS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ULS has been loosely correlated with ARMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ULS jumps, then ARMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ULS
1D Price
Change %
ULS100%
-1.47%
ARMK - ULS
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
RELX - ULS
33%
Poorly correlated
-14.13%
CTAS - ULS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
FA - ULS
28%
Poorly correlated
-8.10%
RBA - ULS
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.40%
More