It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
RAMP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSGGEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
RAMP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
RAMP (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.18% price change this week, while SGGEF (@Packaged Software) price change was +3.14% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.96%.
RAMP is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
RAMP | SGGEF | RAMP / SGGEF | |
Capitalization | 2.28B | 12.3B | 19% |
EBITDA | 9.38M | 422M | 2% |
Gain YTD | -24.894 | -11.089 | 225% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 45.66 | - |
Revenue | 636M | 2.1B | 30% |
Total Cash | 531M | 575M | 92% |
Total Debt | 44.1M | 1.27B | 3% |
RAMP | SGGEF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 16 | 83 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 13 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 89 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | 56 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 89 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 21 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SGGEF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RAMP (98) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SGGEF’s stock grew significantly faster than RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
SGGEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RAMP (100) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SGGEF’s stock grew significantly faster than RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
SGGEF's SMR Rating (71) in the null industry is in the same range as RAMP (89) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SGGEF’s stock grew similarly to RAMP’s over the last 12 months.
RAMP's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as SGGEF (56) in the null industry. This means that RAMP’s stock grew similarly to SGGEF’s over the last 12 months.
RAMP's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for SGGEF (89) in the null industry. This means that RAMP’s stock grew significantly faster than SGGEF’s over the last 12 months.
RAMP | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago71% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago70% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago74% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago72% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RAMP has been loosely correlated with FROG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RAMP jumps, then FROG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RAMP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RAMP | 100% | -1.18% | ||
FROG - RAMP | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.32% | ||
BMBL - RAMP | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.12% | ||
EGHT - RAMP | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
LKRY - RAMP | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
EVCM - RAMP | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.63% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SGGEF and SGPYY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SGGEF and SGPYY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGGEF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SGGEF | 100% | N/A | ||
SGPYY - SGGEF | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.22% | ||
ADYEY - SGGEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.26% | ||
RAMP - SGGEF | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.18% | ||
ADYYF - SGGEF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.00% | ||
MDTC - SGGEF | 20% Poorly correlated | -13.61% | ||
More |