Advertisement
QZMRF vs RKMSF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QZMRF is a Hold and RKMSF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QZMRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRKMSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- QZMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- RKMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QZMRF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RKMSF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- QZMRF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
- RKMSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
QZMRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -10.59% price change this week, while RKMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +19.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| QZMRF | RKMSF | QZMRF / RKMSF | |
| Capitalization | 31.9M | 5.13M | 622% |
| EBITDA | -3.98M | -695.21K | 572% |
| Gain YTD | 134.464 | 98.282 | 137% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 4.15M | 19.8K | 20,955% |
| Total Debt | 13.4K | N/A | - |
QZMRF | RKMSF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 28 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
RKMSF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QZMRF (65). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.
QZMRF's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RKMSF (100). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.
QZMRF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (100). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.
RKMSF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as QZMRF (64). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.
QZMRF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RKMSF (100). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.
| QZMRF | RKMSF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 38% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 51% | 3 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 64% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 49% | 3 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 35% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 20 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 82% |
Advertisement
QZMRF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QZMRF and RKMSF have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QZMRF and RKMSF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QZMRF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QZMRF | 100% | +4.87% | ||
| RKMSF - QZMRF | 11% Poorly correlated | -13.79% | ||
| PUTKY - QZMRF | 5% Poorly correlated | +10.74% | ||
| RCKTF - QZMRF | 2% Poorly correlated | -0.12% | ||
| QMCQF - QZMRF | -1% Poorly correlated | -6.50% | ||
| REEMF - QZMRF | -1% Poorly correlated | +2.14% | ||
More | ||||
RKMSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that RKMSF and BRYGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RKMSF and BRYGF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RKMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RKMSF | 100% | -13.79% | ||
| BRYGF - RKMSF | 29% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| GOMRF - RKMSF | 26% Poorly correlated | -10.03% | ||
| SIERF - RKMSF | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| QZMRF - RKMSF | 11% Poorly correlated | +4.87% | ||
| QMCQF - RKMSF | 11% Poorly correlated | -6.50% | ||
More | ||||