QZMRF
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
32.47M
RGLSF
Price
$1.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
226.13M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QZMRF vs RGLSF

Header iconQZMRF vs RGLSF Comparison
Open Charts QZMRF vs RGLSFBanner chart's image
Quartz Mountain Resources
Price$0.47
Change-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Volume$8.96K
Capitalization32.47M
Regulus Resources
Price$1.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$11.51K
Capitalization226.13M
QZMRF vs RGLSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QZMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QZMRF vs. RGLSF commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QZMRF is a Hold and RGLSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (QZMRF: $0.47 vs. RGLSF: $1.78)
Brand notoriety: QZMRF and RGLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QZMRF: 91% vs. RGLSF: 190%
Market capitalization -- QZMRF: $32.47M vs. RGLSF: $226.13M
QZMRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $32.47M. RGLSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $226.13M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.29B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QZMRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QZMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGLSF is a better buy in the long-term than QZMRF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QZMRF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLSF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QZMRF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • RGLSF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RGLSF is a better buy in the short-term than QZMRF.

Price Growth

QZMRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -5.67% price change this week, while RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +56.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.50% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($226M) has a higher market cap than QZMRF($32.5M). QZMRF YTD gains are higher at: 124.905 vs. RGLSF (33.985). RGLSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.65M vs. QZMRF (-3.98M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 11.1M vs. QZMRF (4.15M). QZMRF (0) and RGLSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
QZMRFRGLSFQZMRF / RGLSF
Capitalization32.5M226M14%
EBITDA-3.98M-3.65M109%
Gain YTD124.90533.985368%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash4.15M11.1M37%
Total Debt13.4KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QZMRF vs RGLSF: Fundamental Ratings
QZMRF
RGLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5937
SMR RATING
1..100
9994
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5150
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
374
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QZMRF's Valuation (66) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (74). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as QZMRF (59). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as QZMRF (99). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as QZMRF (51). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.

QZMRF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLSF (74). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QZMRFRGLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
13%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QZMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IPXHY17.500.23
+1.33%
Inpex Corp.
BFLBY21.50N/A
N/A
Bilfinger SE
ARSEF0.04N/A
N/A
Altai Resources Inc.
DYFSF0.09N/A
N/A
Dynacert Inc
YUGVF4.65N/A
N/A
Yougov Plc

QZMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QZMRF and NLIBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QZMRF and NLIBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QZMRF
1D Price
Change %
QZMRF100%
-0.69%
NLIBF - QZMRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - QZMRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNOMF - QZMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNPNF - QZMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.01%
RKMSF - QZMRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLSF has been loosely correlated with ETRUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGLSF jumps, then ETRUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
+0.11%
ETRUF - RGLSF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKRFF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.05%
RKMSF - RGLSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCKTF - RGLSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QZMRF - RGLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.69%
More