QZMRF
Price
$0.55
Change
+$0.03 (+5.77%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.01M
RGLSF
Price
$1.76
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
133.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QZMRF vs RGLSF

Header iconQZMRF vs RGLSF Comparison
Open Charts QZMRF vs RGLSFBanner chart's image
Quartz Mountain Resources
Price$0.55
Change+$0.03 (+5.77%)
Volume$524
Capitalization9.01M
Regulus Resources
Price$1.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization133.61M
QZMRF vs RGLSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QZMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QZMRF vs. RGLSF commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QZMRF is a Hold and RGLSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (QZMRF: $0.55 vs. RGLSF: $1.76)
Brand notoriety: QZMRF and RGLSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QZMRF: 9% vs. RGLSF: 21%
Market capitalization -- QZMRF: $9.01M vs. RGLSF: $133.61M
QZMRF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $9.01M. RGLSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $133.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QZMRF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRGLSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QZMRF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RGLSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, QZMRF is a better buy in the long-term than RGLSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QZMRF’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGLSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QZMRF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGLSF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QZMRF is a better buy in the short-term than RGLSF.

Price Growth

QZMRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +5.88% price change this week, while RGLSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.69% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGLSF($134M) has a higher market cap than QZMRF($9.01M). QZMRF YTD gains are higher at: 162.190 vs. RGLSF (32.481). QZMRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.17M vs. RGLSF (-2.57M). RGLSF has more cash in the bank: 16.5M vs. QZMRF (238K). QZMRF (0) and RGLSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
QZMRFRGLSFQZMRF / RGLSF
Capitalization9.01M134M7%
EBITDA-1.17M-2.57M46%
Gain YTD162.19032.481499%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash238K16.5M1%
Total Debt35.1KN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QZMRF vs RGLSF: Fundamental Ratings
QZMRF
RGLSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4829
SMR RATING
1..100
9991
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
276
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QZMRF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (70). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as QZMRF (48). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.

RGLSF's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as QZMRF (99). This means that RGLSF’s stock grew similarly to QZMRF’s over the last 12 months.

QZMRF's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RGLSF (42). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew similarly to RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

QZMRF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RGLSF (76). This means that QZMRF’s stock grew significantly faster than RGLSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QZMRFRGLSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
60%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QZMRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGLSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSCLX30.640.35
+1.16%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Gr Insghts Svc
HGOCX61.570.67
+1.10%
Hartford Growth Opportunities C
LCRIX22.870.14
+0.62%
Leuthold Core Investment Institutional
LHCSX18.330.04
+0.22%
Lord Abbett Health Care R4
BNUEX11.73-0.01
-0.09%
UBS International Sustainable Equity P

QZMRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QZMRF and NLIBF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QZMRF and NLIBF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QZMRF
1D Price
Change %
QZMRF100%
+5.88%
NLIBF - QZMRF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRCAF - QZMRF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JNOMF - QZMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PNPNF - QZMRF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
RKMSF - QZMRF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RGLSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGLSF has been loosely correlated with ETRUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGLSF jumps, then ETRUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGLSF
1D Price
Change %
RGLSF100%
+0.11%
ETRUF - RGLSF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TKRFF - RGLSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.35%
RKMSF - RGLSF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCKTF - RGLSF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QZMRF - RGLSF
5%
Poorly correlated
+5.88%
More