Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QYLD vs SCLZ
QYLD vs SCLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QYLD vs. SCLZ commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QYLD is a Buy and SCLZ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QYLD has more net assets: 7.92B vs. SCLZ (15.1M). SCLZ has a higher annual dividend yield than QYLD: SCLZ (10.678) vs QYLD (6.079). QYLD was incepted earlier than SCLZ: QYLD (12 years) vs SCLZ (14 hours). QYLD (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than SCLZ (0.85). QYLD has a higher turnover SCLZ (4.00) vs SCLZ (4.00).
| QYLD | SCLZ | QYLD / SCLZ | |
| Gain YTD | 6.079 | 10.678 | 57% |
| Net Assets | 7.92B | 15.1M | 52,450% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.85 | 71% |
| Turnover | 21.54 | 4.00 | 539% |
| Yield | 10.53 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 hours | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QYLD | SCLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 41% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 50% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 29 days ago 51% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| JPIN | 68.74 | 0.38 | +0.56% |
| JPMorgan Diversified Return Intl Eq ETF | |||
| XBJA | 31.61 | N/A | N/A |
| Innovator US Eq Acclrtd 9 Bffr ETF Jan | |||
| LFDR | 197.55 | N/A | N/A |
| LifeX Durable Income ETF | |||
| ARKA | 68.32 | N/A | N/A |
| ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Futures Strategy ETF | |||
| BSCU | 16.92 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2030 Corp Bd ETF | |||
QYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLD has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLD jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | 100% | N/A | ||
| NVDA - QYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| AAPL - QYLD | 69% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| ADI - QYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +3.44% | ||
| LRCX - QYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| KLAC - QYLD | 69% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||
SCLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCLZ has been loosely correlated with V. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCLZ jumps, then V could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| V - SCLZ | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| MCO - SCLZ | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AAPL - SCLZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| MA - SCLZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.52% | ||
| CSCO - SCLZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +3.14% | ||
More | ||||