Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QYLD vs SCLZ
QYLD vs SCLZ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QYLD vs. SCLZ commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QYLD is a Hold and SCLZ is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QYLD has more net assets: 8.17B vs. SCLZ (13.4M). SCLZ has a higher annual dividend yield than QYLD: SCLZ (5.819) vs QYLD (-0.249). QYLD was incepted earlier than SCLZ: QYLD (12 years) vs SCLZ (2 years). QYLD (0.60) has a lower expense ratio than SCLZ (0.85). QYLD has a higher turnover SCLZ (4.00) vs SCLZ (4.00).
| QYLD | SCLZ | QYLD / SCLZ | |
| Gain YTD | -0.249 | 5.819 | -4% |
| Net Assets | 8.17B | 13.4M | 60,993% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.85 | 71% |
| Turnover | 21.54 | 4.00 | 539% |
| Yield | 11.14 | 8.29 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QYLD | SCLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 53% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QYLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QYLD has been closely correlated with AAPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QYLD jumps, then AAPL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QYLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QYLD | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| AAPL - QYLD | 71% Closely correlated | -0.04% | ||
| AMD - QYLD | 70% Closely correlated | -6.58% | ||
| NVDA - QYLD | 70% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| ADI - QYLD | 70% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
| MSFT - QYLD | 69% Closely correlated | -2.55% | ||
More | ||||
SCLZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCLZ has been loosely correlated with MA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCLZ jumps, then MA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCLZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCLZ | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| MA - SCLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| MCO - SCLZ | 65% Loosely correlated | -0.15% | ||
| CSCO - SCLZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -1.60% | ||
| ITW - SCLZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.21% | ||
| V - SCLZ | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
More | ||||