Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QVML vs RECS
QVML vs RECS Comparison
Open Charts QVML vs RECS
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
Price$38.30
Change+$0.07 (+0.18%)
Volume$376
Net Assets1.39B
Columbia Research Enhanced Core ETF
Price$39.08
Change+$0.03 (+0.08%)
Volume$813
Net Assets3.57B
QVML vs RECS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QVML vs. RECS commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QVML is a StrongBuy and RECS is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RECS has more net assets: 3.57B vs. QVML (1.39B). RECS has a higher annual dividend yield than QVML: RECS (12.796) vs QVML (11.446). QVML was incepted earlier than RECS: QVML (4 years) vs RECS (6 years). QVML (0.11) has a lower expense ratio than RECS (0.15). RECS has a higher turnover QVML (15.00) vs QVML (15.00).
| QVML | RECS | QVML / RECS | |
| Gain YTD | 11.446 | 12.796 | 89% |
| Net Assets | 1.39B | 3.57B | 39% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.15 | 73% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 49.00 | 31% |
| Yield | 1.12 | 0.62 | 181% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QVML | RECS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 60% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 57% | 4 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | 4 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 74% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QVML and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that QVML and PSKY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QVML and PSKY's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QVML | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QVML | 100% | -0.56% | ||
| PSKY - QVML | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.76% | ||
| SNDK - QVML | 22% Poorly correlated | +9.68% | ||
| CRL - QVML | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.04% | ||
| GILD - QVML | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.02% | ||
| INCY - QVML | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
More | ||||
RECS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RECS has been loosely correlated with CR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RECS jumps, then CR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RECS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RECS | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CR - RECS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.44% | ||
| AMZN - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.42% | ||
| MSFT - RECS | 60% Loosely correlated | -2.55% | ||
| EXP - RECS | 59% Loosely correlated | +4.14% | ||
| INTU - RECS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||