QVCGP
Price
$7.14
Change
+$0.14 (+2.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
SBDS
Price
$15.88
Change
+$1.88 (+13.43%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
26.16M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QVCGP vs SBDS

Header iconQVCGP vs SBDS Comparison
Open Charts QVCGP vs SBDSBanner chart's image
QVC Group
Price$7.14
Change+$0.14 (+2.00%)
Volume$36.77K
CapitalizationN/A
Solo Brands
Price$15.88
Change+$1.88 (+13.43%)
Volume$14.09K
Capitalization26.16M
QVCGP vs SBDS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QVCGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QVCGP vs. SBDS commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QVCGP is a Buy and SBDS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (QVCGP: $7.14 vs. SBDS: $15.88)
Brand notoriety: QVCGP and SBDS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QVCGP: 58% vs. SBDS: 75%
Market capitalization -- QVCGP: $0 vs. SBDS: $26.16M
QVCGP [@Internet Retail] is valued at $0. SBDS’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $26.16M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $51.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QVCGP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSBDS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QVCGP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SBDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBDS is a better buy in the long-term than QVCGP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QVCGP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SBDS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QVCGP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SBDS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SBDS is a better buy in the short-term than QVCGP.

Price Growth

QVCGP (@Internet Retail) experienced а -17.65% price change this week, while SBDS (@Internet Retail) price change was -16.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +164.08%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-2.00% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBDS YTD gains are higher at: -65.175 vs. QVCGP (-78.159). SBDS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -166.65M vs. QVCGP (-3.03B). QVCGP has more cash in the bank: 897M vs. SBDS (18.1M). SBDS has less debt than QVCGP: SBDS (265M) vs QVCGP (5.51B). QVCGP has higher revenues than SBDS: QVCGP (9.63B) vs SBDS (407M).
QVCGPSBDSQVCGP / SBDS
CapitalizationN/A26.2M-
EBITDA-3.03B-166.65M1,816%
Gain YTD-78.159-65.175120%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue9.63B407M2,366%
Total Cash897M18.1M4,956%
Total Debt5.51B265M2,080%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QVCGPSBDS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QVCGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SBDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FUSB12.390.39
+3.25%
First US Bancshares
WLK77.651.65
+2.17%
Westlake Corp
CMCO14.610.20
+1.39%
Columbus McKinnon Corp
OAKUU11.85N/A
N/A
Oak Woods Acquisition Corp
METCB16.12-0.23
-1.41%
Ramaco Resources

QVCGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QVCGP has been loosely correlated with QVCGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QVCGP jumps, then QVCGA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QVCGP
1D Price
Change %
QVCGP100%
+2.00%
QVCGA - QVCGP
36%
Loosely correlated
+7.66%
RVLV - QVCGP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.32%
MELI - QVCGP
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
W - QVCGP
27%
Poorly correlated
+2.18%
AMZN - QVCGP
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

SBDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBDS and DIBS have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBDS and DIBS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBDS
1D Price
Change %
SBDS100%
+13.43%
DIBS - SBDS
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.94%
RERE - SBDS
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
ZKH - SBDS
4%
Poorly correlated
-1.04%
JFBR - SBDS
4%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
QVCGP - SBDS
1%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
More