QUILF
Price
$2.20
Change
-$0.01 (-0.45%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
2.88B
RESCU
Price
$0.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
N/A
Interact to see
Advertisement

QUILF vs RESCU

Header iconQUILF vs RESCU Comparison
Open Charts QUILF vs RESCUBanner chart's image
Quilter
Price$2.20
Change-$0.01 (-0.45%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization2.88B
Rescap Liquidating Trust
Price$0.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$900
CapitalizationN/A
QUILF vs RESCU Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QUILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QUILF vs. RESCU commentary
Sep 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUILF is a Hold and RESCU is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 09, 2025
Stock price -- (QUILF: $2.20 vs. RESCU: $0.12)
Brand notoriety: QUILF and RESCU are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QUILF: 234% vs. RESCU: 84%
Market capitalization -- QUILF: $2.88B vs. RESCU: $0
QUILF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.88B. RESCU’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QUILF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRESCU’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QUILF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • RESCU’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUILF is a better buy in the long-term than RESCU.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QUILF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RESCU’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QUILF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RESCU’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QUILF is a better buy in the short-term than RESCU.

Price Growth

QUILF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while RESCU (@Investment Managers) price change was -78.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +44.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.12% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUILF YTD gains are higher at: 20.846 vs. RESCU (-20.530).
QUILFRESCUQUILF / RESCU
Capitalization2.88BN/A-
EBITDA79MN/A-
Gain YTD20.846-20.530-102%
P/E Ratio40.06N/A-
Revenue4.6BN/A-
Total Cash66.3BN/A-
Total Debt274MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QUILF vs RESCU: Fundamental Ratings
QUILF
RESCU
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80100
SMR RATING
1..100
93100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4196
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
32100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QUILF's Valuation (18) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (35). This means that QUILF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (100). This means that QUILF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as RESCU (100). This means that QUILF’s stock grew similarly to RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RESCU (96). This means that QUILF’s stock grew somewhat faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

QUILF's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for RESCU (100). This means that QUILF’s stock grew significantly faster than RESCU’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QUILFRESCU
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QUILF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RESCU
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GTDFX36.770.24
+0.66%
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R6
THVRX30.910.16
+0.52%
Thornburg International Equity R4
RWIHX73.100.34
+0.47%
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc R5E
MLOAX8.93-0.07
-0.78%
Cohen & Steers Future of Energy A
BUFBX21.28-0.18
-0.84%
Buffalo Flexible Allocation

QUILF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUILF has been loosely correlated with KRMCF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QUILF jumps, then KRMCF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUILF
1D Price
Change %
QUILF100%
N/A
KRMCF - QUILF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AC - QUILF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STCGF - QUILF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LGGNY - QUILF
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
SOLCF - QUILF
8%
Poorly correlated
-2.54%
More

RESCU and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RESCU and FFXDF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RESCU and FFXDF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RESCU
1D Price
Change %
RESCU100%
N/A
FFXDF - RESCU
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.84%
BRDG - RESCU
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGLD - RESCU
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
ASXSF - RESCU
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QUILF - RESCU
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More