It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
QUBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGTI’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
QUBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGTI’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
QUBT (@Computer Processing Hardware) experienced а +8.99% price change this week, while RGTI (@Computer Processing Hardware) price change was +9.35% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Processing Hardware industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.47%.
QUBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.
RGTI is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Computer Processing Hardware industry produces central processing unit, monitor, keyboard, computer data storage devices, and graphics card. Business activity and economic growth are potential drivers of this industry – if more businesses are growing or flourishing, so would their investments in computer equipment. Dell Technologies, Inc, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., NCR Corporation are key producers of computer processing hardware.
QUBT | RGTI | QUBT / RGTI | |
Capitalization | 2.58B | 4.98B | 52% |
EBITDA | -38.8M | -128.5M | 30% |
Gain YTD | -2.538 | 1.180 | -215% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 385K | 9.21M | 4% |
Total Cash | 166M | 209M | 79% |
Total Debt | 1.06M | 8.41M | 13% |
QUBT | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QUBT | RGTI | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago67% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% | 4 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago89% | 4 days ago78% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago90% | 4 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago82% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago88% | 4 days ago82% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 26 days ago90% | 25 days ago83% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago89% | 4 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago74% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% | 4 days ago83% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ESPRX | 37.87 | 0.21 | +0.56% |
Allspring Special Small Cap Value R6 | |||
CWIFX | 71.60 | 0.36 | +0.51% |
American Funds Capital World Gr&Inc 529F | |||
EKGIX | 39.46 | 0.09 | +0.23% |
Allspring Special Global Small Cap Inst | |||
HLEMX | 41.26 | -0.02 | -0.05% |
Harding Loevner Emerging Markets Advisor | |||
VCRAX | 14.56 | -0.05 | -0.34% |
NYLI CBRE Global Infrastructure Class A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUBT has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUBT jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUBT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
QUBT | 100% | +2.35% | ||
QBTS - QUBT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
RGTI - QUBT | 62% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
IONQ - QUBT | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
QMCO - QUBT | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
UMAC - QUBT | 35% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGTI has been closely correlated with QBTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RGTI jumps, then QBTS could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To RGTI | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
RGTI | 100% | -1.40% | ||
QBTS - RGTI | 70% Closely correlated | -1.57% | ||
IONQ - RGTI | 61% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
QUBT - RGTI | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.35% | ||
QMCO - RGTI | 54% Loosely correlated | -1.52% | ||
UMAC - RGTI | 39% Loosely correlated | +5.21% | ||
More |