QUBHF
Price
$2.71
Change
-$0.10 (-3.56%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
SFWL
Price
$1.17
Change
+$0.02 (+1.74%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
96.52M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QUBHF vs SFWL

Header iconQUBHF vs SFWL Comparison
Open Charts QUBHF vs SFWLBanner chart's image
Qube
Price$2.71
Change-$0.10 (-3.56%)
Volume$427
Capitalization4.64B
Shengfeng Development
Price$1.17
Change+$0.02 (+1.74%)
Volume$19.97K
Capitalization96.52M
QUBHF vs SFWL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QUBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QUBHF vs. SFWL commentary
Sep 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUBHF is a Hold and SFWL is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 28, 2025
Stock price -- (QUBHF: $2.71 vs. SFWL: $1.17)
Brand notoriety: QUBHF and SFWL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Transportation industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QUBHF: 10% vs. SFWL: 94%
Market capitalization -- QUBHF: $4.64B vs. SFWL: $96.52M
QUBHF [@Other Transportation] is valued at $4.64B. SFWL’s [@Other Transportation] market capitalization is $96.52M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Transportation] industry ranges from $70.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Transportation] industry is $8.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QUBHF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSFWL’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QUBHF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFWL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QUBHF is a better buy in the long-term than SFWL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QUBHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFWL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QUBHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SFWL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SFWL is a better buy in the short-term than QUBHF.

Price Growth

QUBHF (@Other Transportation) experienced а -4.38% price change this week, while SFWL (@Other Transportation) price change was +0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Transportation industry was -1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.01%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Transportation (-1.22% weekly)

Other Transportation includes transportation services like providing airport ground transportation, airport management and equipment, shipping services, as well as businesses that operate bridges, expressways and other public services such as taxis and subways. Grupo Aero-pac, Corporacion America Airports S.A. and Matson, Inc. are some of the major companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QUBHF($4.64B) has a higher market cap than SFWL($96.5M). QUBHF has higher P/E ratio than SFWL: QUBHF (64.20) vs SFWL (8.36). QUBHF YTD gains are higher at: 12.282 vs. SFWL (8.333). QUBHF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 658M vs. SFWL (28M). QUBHF has more cash in the bank: 151M vs. SFWL (14.3M). SFWL has less debt than QUBHF: SFWL (86M) vs QUBHF (3.09B). QUBHF has higher revenues than SFWL: QUBHF (4.09B) vs SFWL (540M).
QUBHFSFWLQUBHF / SFWL
Capitalization4.64B96.5M4,806%
EBITDA658M28M2,350%
Gain YTD12.2828.333147%
P/E Ratio64.208.36768%
Revenue4.09B540M757%
Total Cash151M14.3M1,056%
Total Debt3.09B86M3,598%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QUBHFSFWL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QUBHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SFWL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LOECF0.57N/A
+0.58%
LOGAN ENERGY CORP
ECLMF0.12N/A
N/A
Ecolomondo Corp.
LYSFF5.15N/A
N/A
Leroy Seafood Group ASA
MHIFF0.06N/A
N/A
Mineral Hill Industries Ltd.
HAGHY60.36-0.16
-0.26%
HENSOLDT AG

QUBHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QUBHF and JDLGF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QUBHF and JDLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QUBHF
1D Price
Change %
QUBHF100%
-3.70%
JDLGF - QUBHF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DHLGY - QUBHF
11%
Poorly correlated
+1.63%
SFWL - QUBHF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
TTNMF - QUBHF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
CRGO - QUBHF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.61%
More

SFWL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SFWL and FDX have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SFWL and FDX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFWL
1D Price
Change %
SFWL100%
+1.74%
FDX - SFWL
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.59%
JBHT - SFWL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
UPS - SFWL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.38%
GXO - SFWL
16%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
FWRD - SFWL
12%
Poorly correlated
-3.31%
More