Advertisement
QUAL vs SEIC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QUAL is a Buy and SEIC is a Hold.
SEIC | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 34 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 27 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| QUAL | SEIC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 46% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 51% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CCMG | 30.94 | 0.11 | +0.36% |
| CCM Global Equity ETF | |||
| AHYB | 46.62 | 0.04 | +0.08% |
| American Century® Select High Yield ETF | |||
| HFSP | 17.68 | N/A | N/A |
| TradersAI Large Cap Equity & Cash ETF | |||
| EMBD | 23.88 | -0.03 | -0.13% |
| Global X Emerging Markets Bond ETF | |||
| LTTI | 20.04 | -0.03 | -0.17% |
| FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF | |||
QUAL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QUAL has been closely correlated with SEIC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QUAL jumps, then SEIC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QUAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUAL | 100% | +0.61% | ||
| SEIC - QUAL | 80% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| TROW - QUAL | 79% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| MCO - QUAL | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BLK - QUAL | 77% Closely correlated | -0.87% | ||
| KEYS - QUAL | 76% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
More | ||||
SEIC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SEIC has been closely correlated with TROW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SEIC jumps, then TROW could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SEIC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEIC | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| TROW - SEIC | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| BN - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| JHG - SEIC | 77% Closely correlated | -1.04% | ||
| AMG - SEIC | 74% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| BX - SEIC | 73% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
More | ||||