QTWO
Price
$107.09
Change
+$2.56 (+2.45%)
Updated
Dec 18, 03:12 PM (EDT)
63 days until earnings call
WK
Price
$110.98
Change
+$1.70 (+1.56%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:36 PM (EDT)
69 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QTWO vs WK

Header iconQTWO vs WK Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs WKBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$107.09
Change+$2.56 (+2.45%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Workiva
Price$110.98
Change+$1.70 (+1.56%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
QTWO vs WK Comparison Chart
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. WK commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and WK is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (QTWO: $104.54 vs. WK: $109.29)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 74% vs. WK: 124%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.1B vs. WK: $4.64B
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.1B. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QTWO and WK are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both QTWO and WK are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.52% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was +6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.29%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +17.25%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.

WK is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.29% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($4.64B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: 140.820 vs. WK (7.643). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. WK (-59.32M). WK has more cash in the bank: 814M vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than WK: QTWO (549M) vs WK (793M). WK (630M) and QTWO (625M) have equivalent revenues.
QTWOWKQTWO / WK
Capitalization3.11B4.64B67%
EBITDA15.6M-59.32M-26%
Gain YTD140.8207.6431,842%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue625M630M99%
Total Cash324M814M40%
Total Debt549M793M69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7947
SMR RATING
1..100
94100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3639
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (47) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (98). This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (79). This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (94) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (39). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWOWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME31.261.82
+6.18%
GameStop Corp
TSLA479.8616.84
+3.64%
Tesla
AAPL253.482.44
+0.97%
Apple
BTC.X106140.600000110.890625
+0.10%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY604.29-2.50
-0.41%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.80%
ACIW - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
-2.04%
ALKT - QTWO
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.54%
IOT - QTWO
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
WK - QTWO
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.67%
APP - QTWO
48%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with AMPL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then AMPL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
+3.67%
AMPL - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.77%
RPD - WK
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
TDOC - WK
51%
Loosely correlated
-5.71%
BL - WK
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.74%
BIGC - WK
50%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
More