QTWO
Price
$74.85
Change
-$2.03 (-2.64%)
Updated
Apr 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.1B
20 days until earnings call
WK
Price
$67.31
Change
-$2.11 (-3.04%)
Updated
Apr 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.64B
15 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QTWO vs WK

Header iconQTWO vs WK Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs WKBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$74.85
Change-$2.03 (-2.64%)
Volume$3.03K
Capitalization3.1B
Workiva
Price$67.31
Change-$2.11 (-3.04%)
Volume$1.7K
Capitalization4.64B
QTWO vs WK Comparison Chart
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. WK commentary
Apr 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a StrongBuy and WK is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 17, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $76.88 vs. WK: $69.42)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 65% vs. WK: 82%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.1B vs. WK: $4.64B
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.1B. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the short-term than WK.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.87% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was +12.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.75%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

WK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.67% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($4.64B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -23.616 vs. WK (-36.603). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. WK (-59.32M). WK has more cash in the bank: 814M vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than WK: QTWO (549M) vs WK (793M). WK (630M) and QTWO (625M) have equivalent revenues.
QTWOWKQTWO / WK
Capitalization3.11B4.64B67%
EBITDA15.6M-59.32M-26%
Gain YTD-23.616-36.60365%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue625M630M99%
Total Cash324M814M40%
Total Debt549M793M69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8354
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8165
SMR RATING
1..100
92100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5286
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (49) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (99). This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (65) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (81). This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (92) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (86). This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWOWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA254.111.76
+0.70%
Tesla
AAPL202.14-0.38
-0.19%
Apple
SPY537.61-1.51
-0.28%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X83668.990000-873.398440
-1.03%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME26.70-0.28
-1.04%
GameStop Corp

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+1.91%
ACIW - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.42%
EVCM - QTWO
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.00%
ANSS - QTWO
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
CWAN - QTWO
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with BL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then BL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
+1.37%
BL - WK
56%
Loosely correlated
-1.76%
AGYS - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
QTWO - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.91%
ACIW - WK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
BRZE - WK
52%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
More