QTWO
Price
$93.99
Change
-$0.74 (-0.78%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
31 days until earnings call
WK
Price
$65.82
Change
+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Updated
Jun 27 closing price
Capitalization
4.64B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs WK

Header iconQTWO vs WK Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs WKBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$93.99
Change-$0.74 (-0.78%)
Volume$1.12M
Capitalization3.1B
Workiva
Price$65.82
Change+$0.02 (+0.03%)
Volume$450.48K
Capitalization4.64B
QTWO vs WK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. WK commentary
Jun 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Buy and WK is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 30, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $93.99 vs. WK: $65.82)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and WK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 199% vs. WK: 82%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.1B vs. WK: $4.64B
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.1B. WK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $4.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than WK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WK’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WK’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WK is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +6.20% price change this week, while WK (@Packaged Software) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.15%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

WK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.15% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WK($4.64B) has a higher market cap than QTWO($3.11B). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -6.617 vs. WK (-39.890). QTWO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 15.6M vs. WK (-59.32M). WK has more cash in the bank: 814M vs. QTWO (324M). QTWO has less debt than WK: QTWO (549M) vs WK (793M). WK (630M) and QTWO (625M) have equivalent revenues.
QTWOWKQTWO / WK
Capitalization3.11B4.64B67%
EBITDA15.6M-59.32M-26%
Gain YTD-6.617-39.89017%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue625M630M99%
Total Cash324M814M40%
Total Debt549M793M69%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs WK: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
WK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8570
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9080
SMR RATING
1..100
91100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4582
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (55) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (98). This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

WK's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (90). This means that WK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's SMR Rating (91) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WK (82). This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than WK’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as WK (100). This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to WK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWOWK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBSLX26.440.19
+0.72%
ClearBridge Sustainability Leaders R
CAMWX28.330.18
+0.64%
Cambiar Opportunity Inst
RMFBX58.090.13
+0.22%
American Funds American Mutual R2
WBVRX27.820.05
+0.18%
William Blair Small Cap Value R6
AASRX23.500.04
+0.17%
American Beacon Small Cap Value R6

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.78%
FRSH - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ADSK - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.07%
ALKT - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.30%
ANSS - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.10%
WEAV - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

WK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WK has been loosely correlated with QTWO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WK jumps, then QTWO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WK
1D Price
Change %
WK100%
+0.03%
QTWO - WK
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.78%
FRSH - WK
55%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BL - WK
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
AGYS - WK
53%
Loosely correlated
-4.44%
XYZ - WK
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.33%
More