QTWO
Price
$75.00
Change
+$1.53 (+2.08%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.59B
33 days until earnings call
TRAK
Price
$16.94
Change
-$0.08 (-0.47%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
311.06M
3 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs TRAK

Header iconQTWO vs TRAK Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs TRAKBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$75.00
Change+$1.53 (+2.08%)
Volume$8.01K
Capitalization4.59B
ReposiTrak
Price$16.94
Change-$0.08 (-0.47%)
Volume$412
Capitalization311.06M
QTWO vs TRAK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. TRAK commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a StrongBuy and TRAK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $73.47 vs. TRAK: $17.02)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and TRAK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 66% vs. TRAK: 41%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $4.59B vs. TRAK: $311.06M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.59B. TRAK’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $311.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $313.68B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTRAK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TRAK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, TRAK is a better buy in the long-term than QTWO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRAK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TRAK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TRAK is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а -12.78% price change this week, while TRAK (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.02%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +112.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

TRAK is expected to report earnings on Sep 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.02% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.59B) has a higher market cap than TRAK($311M). QTWO has higher P/E ratio than TRAK: QTWO (1224.50) vs TRAK (50.06). TRAK YTD gains are higher at: -22.953 vs. QTWO (-27.004). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. TRAK (28.1M). TRAK has less debt than QTWO: TRAK (778K) vs QTWO (539M).
QTWOTRAKQTWO / TRAK
Capitalization4.59B311M1,475%
EBITDA77.5MN/A-
Gain YTD-27.004-22.953118%
P/E Ratio1224.5050.062,446%
Revenue743MN/A-
Total Cash532M28.1M1,893%
Total Debt539M778K69,280%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs TRAK: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
TRAK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
413
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
25
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10034
SMR RATING
1..100
9258
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8161
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5783
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TRAK's Valuation (25) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's Profit vs Risk Rating (34) in the Data Processing Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew significantly faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's SMR Rating (58) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QTWO (92) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew somewhat faster than QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TRAK's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as QTWO (81) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that TRAK’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as TRAK (83) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to TRAK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWOTRAK
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TRAK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALGYX115.28N/A
N/A
Alger Focus Equity Y
ECLCX31.66-0.15
-0.47%
Eaton Vance Growth C
NDGAX25.10-0.13
-0.52%
Neuberger Berman Dividend Growth A
CIRCX78.62-0.45
-0.57%
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529C
NRINX24.05-0.17
-0.70%
Neuberger Berman Intrinsic Value R6

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.38%
FRSH - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
-2.58%
HUBS - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
ALKT - QTWO
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
-3.58%
EVCM - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.71%
More

TRAK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TRAK has been loosely correlated with RBBN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TRAK jumps, then RBBN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TRAK
1D Price
Change %
TRAK100%
-2.85%
RBBN - TRAK
47%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
PAR - TRAK
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.20%
DJCO - TRAK
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.99%
INTA - TRAK
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.50%
QTWO - TRAK
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
More