QTWO
Price
$75.71
Change
+$1.15 (+1.54%)
Updated
Aug 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.66B
72 days until earnings call
RPAY
Price
$5.54
Change
+$0.10 (+1.84%)
Updated
Aug 18, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
467.23M
79 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QTWO vs RPAY

Header iconQTWO vs RPAY Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs RPAYBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$75.71
Change+$1.15 (+1.54%)
Volume$7.4K
Capitalization4.66B
Repay Holdings
Price$5.54
Change+$0.10 (+1.84%)
Volume$28.97K
Capitalization467.23M
QTWO vs RPAY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. RPAY commentary
Aug 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and RPAY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 19, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $74.56 vs. RPAY: $5.43)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and RPAY are both not notable
QTWO represents the Packaged Software, while RPAY is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 102% vs. RPAY: 107%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $4.66B vs. RPAY: $467.23M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $4.66B. RPAY’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $467.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $324.27B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.87T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.97B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $26.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRPAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RPAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than RPAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPAY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • RPAY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RPAY is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.26% price change this week, while RPAY (@Computer Communications) price change was +5.44% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.25%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.42%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

RPAY is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.82% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Computer Communications (+2.92% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($4.66B) has a higher market cap than RPAY($467M). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -25.922 vs. RPAY (-28.834). RPAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 97.6M vs. QTWO (77.5M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 532M vs. RPAY (165M). RPAY has less debt than QTWO: RPAY (509M) vs QTWO (539M). QTWO has higher revenues than RPAY: QTWO (743M) vs RPAY (310M).
QTWORPAYQTWO / RPAY
Capitalization4.66B467M997%
EBITDA77.5M97.6M79%
Gain YTD-25.922-28.83490%
P/E Ratio1242.67N/A-
Revenue743M310M240%
Total Cash532M165M322%
Total Debt539M509M106%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs RPAY: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
RPAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
96
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9191
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6272
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RPAY's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (96) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

RPAY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

RPAY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (91) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

RPAY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (64) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RPAY (72) in the null industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RPAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWORPAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LDVIX30.110.18
+0.60%
AXS FTSE Vntr Cptl RetTrckr I
IHOFX21.810.05
+0.23%
Hartford International Opportunities F
IENSX31.290.02
+0.06%
Invesco Energy R6
FWCBX78.01N/A
N/A
American Funds Capital Income Bldr 529F3
FDFAX89.12-0.06
-0.07%
Fidelity Select Consumer Staples Port

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been closely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
-0.32%
FRSH - QTWO
68%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
HUBS - QTWO
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
ADSK - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
ALKT - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.90%
WEAV - QTWO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.65%
More

RPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPAY has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPAY jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPAY
1D Price
Change %
RPAY100%
-1.45%
CPAY - RPAY
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.80%
PSFE - RPAY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
ALIT - RPAY
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
QTWO - RPAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
EEFT - RPAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.64%
More