QTWO
Price
$91.01
Change
+$0.72 (+0.80%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
3.1B
73 days until earnings call
RPAY
Price
$4.10
Change
+$0.26 (+6.77%)
Updated
May 16 closing price
Capitalization
978.87M
80 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

QTWO vs RPAY

Header iconQTWO vs RPAY Comparison
Open Charts QTWO vs RPAYBanner chart's image
Q2 Holdings
Price$91.01
Change+$0.72 (+0.80%)
Volume$486.31K
Capitalization3.1B
Repay Holdings
Price$4.10
Change+$0.26 (+6.77%)
Volume$3.63M
Capitalization978.87M
QTWO vs RPAY Comparison Chart
Loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QTWO vs. RPAY commentary
May 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTWO is a Hold and RPAY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 18, 2025
Stock price -- (QTWO: $91.01 vs. RPAY: $4.10)
Brand notoriety: QTWO and RPAY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QTWO: 64% vs. RPAY: 218%
Market capitalization -- QTWO: $3.1B vs. RPAY: $978.87M
QTWO [@Packaged Software] is valued at $3.1B. RPAY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $978.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QTWO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRPAY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • QTWO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RPAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, QTWO is a better buy in the long-term than RPAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QTWO’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RPAY’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QTWO’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RPAY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RPAY is a better buy in the short-term than QTWO.

Price Growth

QTWO (@Packaged Software) experienced а +1.55% price change this week, while RPAY (@Packaged Software) price change was +4.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +54.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

QTWO is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

RPAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+3.85% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QTWO($3.11B) has a higher market cap than RPAY($979M). QTWO YTD gains are higher at: -9.578 vs. RPAY (-46.265). RPAY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 78.3M vs. QTWO (15.6M). QTWO has more cash in the bank: 324M vs. RPAY (118M). RPAY has less debt than QTWO: RPAY (443M) vs QTWO (549M). QTWO has higher revenues than RPAY: QTWO (625M) vs RPAY (297M).
QTWORPAYQTWO / RPAY
Capitalization3.11B979M317%
EBITDA15.6M78.3M20%
Gain YTD-9.578-46.26521%
P/E RatioN/A54.35-
Revenue625M297M210%
Total Cash324M118M275%
Total Debt549M443M124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QTWO vs RPAY: Fundamental Ratings
QTWO
RPAY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
139
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
79100
SMR RATING
1..100
9391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4493
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10070
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QTWO's Valuation (48) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPAY (82) in the null industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPAY’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Profit vs Risk Rating (79) in the Information Technology Services industry is in the same range as RPAY (100) in the null industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew similarly to RPAY’s over the last 12 months.

RPAY's SMR Rating (91) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (93) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

QTWO's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Information Technology Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RPAY (93) in the null industry. This means that QTWO’s stock grew somewhat faster than RPAY’s over the last 12 months.

RPAY's P/E Growth Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as QTWO (100) in the Information Technology Services industry. This means that RPAY’s stock grew similarly to QTWO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QTWORPAY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
QTWO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA349.987.16
+2.09%
Tesla
SPY594.203.74
+0.63%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
AAPL211.26-0.19
-0.09%
Apple
BTC.X103191.086000-298.203120
-0.29%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME28.45-0.18
-0.63%
GameStop Corp

QTWO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTWO has been loosely correlated with FRSH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QTWO jumps, then FRSH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QTWO
1D Price
Change %
QTWO100%
+0.80%
FRSH - QTWO
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
ALKT - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.31%
ANSS - QTWO
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
WEAV - QTWO
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.37%
ADSK - QTWO
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
More

RPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RPAY has been loosely correlated with CPAY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RPAY jumps, then CPAY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RPAY
1D Price
Change %
RPAY100%
+6.77%
CPAY - RPAY
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.45%
PSFE - RPAY
48%
Loosely correlated
+1.76%
FIVN - RPAY
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.37%
QTWO - RPAY
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
IIIV - RPAY
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.76%
More