Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs XLK
QTUM vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs XLK
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$110.00
Change-$0.53 (-0.48%)
Volume$564.21K
Net Assets2.91B
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$285.01
Change+$0.50 (+0.18%)
Volume$12.76M
Net Assets91.26B
QTUM vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. XLK commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 91.3B vs. QTUM (2.91B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than XLK: QTUM (36.528) vs XLK (23.151). QTUM was incepted earlier than XLK: QTUM (7 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover XLK (39.00) vs XLK (39.00).
| QTUM | XLK | QTUM / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 36.528 | 23.151 | 158% |
| Net Assets | 2.91B | 91.3B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.08 | 500% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 39.00 | 118% |
| Yield | 0.70 | 0.54 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | -0.48% | ||
| MU - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.07% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| NXPI - QTUM | 67% Closely correlated | -1.41% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| APH - XLK | 77% Closely correlated | -1.34% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 76% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| MSFT - XLK | 75% Closely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||