Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SMH
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$111.51
Change-$0.45 (-0.40%)
Volume$237.34K
Net Assets3.23B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$365.86
Change+$1.69 (+0.46%)
Volume$2.92M
Net Assets37.57B
QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Dec 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. QTUM (3.23B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (51.076) vs QTUM (38.402). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| QTUM | SMH | QTUM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 38.402 | 51.076 | 75% |
| Net Assets | 3.23B | 37.6B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 15.00 | 307% |
| Yield | 0.68 | 0.30 | 224% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | -0.40% | ||
| MU - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.48% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| UCTT - QTUM | 67% Closely correlated | -0.53% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
More | ||||