Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SMH
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$87.56
Change-$1.60 (-1.79%)
Volume$372.97K
Net Assets1.42B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$256.99
Change-$6.16 (-2.34%)
Volume$11.95M
Net Assets24.44B
QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Jun 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 24.4B vs. QTUM (1.42B). QTUM has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: QTUM (8.119) vs SMH (6.120). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| QTUM | SMH | QTUM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 8.119 | 6.120 | 133% |
| Net Assets | 1.42B | 24.4B | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 18.00 | 256% |
| Yield | 0.65 | 0.45 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 26 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with TER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then TER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | -1.80% | ||
| TER - QTUM | 76% Closely correlated | -3.29% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 75% Closely correlated | -4.67% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| ASML - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| NXPI - QTUM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.99% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -2.34% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -3.21% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -6.34% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | -2.52% | ||
More | ||||