Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$290.89
Change-$5.97 (-2.01%)
Volume$96.62K
Net Assets27.18B
QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Aug 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.2B vs. QTUM (1.96B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (22.583) vs QTUM (16.791). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| QTUM | SMH | QTUM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.791 | 22.583 | 74% |
| Net Assets | 1.96B | 27.2B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 15.00 | 307% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 0.37 | 180% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 80% | 14 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DULL | 3.92 | 0.01 | +0.28% |
| MicroSectors™ Gold -3X Inverse Lvrgd ETN | |||
| DRUP | 62.78 | 0.04 | +0.07% |
| GraniteShares Nasdaq Sel Disruptors ETF | |||
| BOCT | 46.91 | 0.02 | +0.04% |
| Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ Oct | |||
| BUFC | 40.04 | N/A | N/A |
| AB Conservative Buffer ETF | |||
| NCIQ | 31.73 | -0.14 | -0.43% |
| Hashdex Nasdaq Crypto Index US ETF | |||
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | +0.35% | ||
| MU - QTUM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.22% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.88% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 70% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| NXPI - QTUM | 68% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.41% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.63% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +0.86% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | +1.06% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
More | ||||