Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SMH
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$93.76
Change-$0.04 (-0.04%)
Volume$360.36K
Net Assets1.85B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$291.41
Change+$3.92 (+1.36%)
Volume$5.67M
Net Assets26.55B
QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26.5B vs. QTUM (1.85B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (20.333) vs QTUM (16.110). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| QTUM | SMH | QTUM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 16.110 | 20.333 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 1.85B | 26.5B | 7% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 15.00 | 307% |
| Yield | 0.67 | 0.38 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 75% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 88% | 5 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 15 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GRNY | 23.67 | 0.07 | +0.30% |
| Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | |||
| USEP | 37.57 | 0.02 | +0.06% |
| Innovator US Equity Ultra Buffer ETF-Sep | |||
| PSFM | 30.53 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF | |||
| GXC | 93.30 | -0.13 | -0.14% |
| SPDR® S&P China ETF | |||
| DISV | 33.40 | -0.54 | -1.59% |
| Dimensional International Sm Cp Val ETF | |||
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with TER. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then TER could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| TER - QTUM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 75% Closely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| ASML - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| NXPI - QTUM | 72% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| AVGO - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
More | ||||