Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QTUM vs SMH
QTUM vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts QTUM vs SMH
Defiance Quantum ETF
Price$106.88
Change-$3.85 (-3.48%)
Volume$11.35K
Net Assets3.15B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$344.63
Change-$10.90 (-3.07%)
Volume$117.54K
Net Assets37.62B
QTUM vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QTUM vs. SMH commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QTUM is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.6B vs. QTUM (3.16B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than QTUM: SMH (46.810) vs QTUM (37.434). QTUM was incepted earlier than SMH: QTUM (7 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than QTUM (0.40). QTUM has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| QTUM | SMH | QTUM / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 37.434 | 46.810 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 3.16B | 37.6B | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.35 | 114% |
| Turnover | 46.00 | 15.00 | 307% |
| Yield | 0.64 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| QTUM | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGBL | 35.04 | 0.09 | +0.26% |
| Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | |||
| CCNR | 32.50 | 0.05 | +0.16% |
| ALPS/CoreCommodity Natural Resources ETF | |||
| XTOC | 33.05 | 0.02 | +0.07% |
| Innovator US Equity Acclrtd Pls ETF™ Oct | |||
| ECOW | 25.57 | 0.01 | +0.03% |
| Pacer Emerging Markets Cash Cows 100 ETF | |||
| GRPM | 119.07 | -0.12 | -0.10% |
| Invesco S&P MidCap 400® GARP ETF | |||
QTUM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QTUM has been closely correlated with MU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if QTUM jumps, then MU could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To QTUM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QTUM | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| MU - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +1.57% | ||
| LRCX - QTUM | 74% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| MKSI - QTUM | 73% Closely correlated | +0.35% | ||
| KLAC - QTUM | 71% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| UCTT - QTUM | 67% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||