QSR
Price
$62.51
Change
-$0.82 (-1.29%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
20.68B
57 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$145.41
Change
-$1.56 (-1.06%)
Updated
Sep 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
40.79B
63 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSR vs YUM

Header iconQSR vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts QSR vs YUMBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International
Price$62.51
Change-$0.82 (-1.29%)
Volume$11.02K
Capitalization20.68B
Yum! Brands
Price$145.41
Change-$1.56 (-1.06%)
Volume$12.25K
Capitalization40.79B
QSR vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSR vs. YUM commentary
Sep 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSR is a StrongBuy and YUM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 03, 2025
Stock price -- (QSR: $63.33 vs. YUM: $146.97)
Brand notoriety: QSR: Not notable vs. YUM: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSR: 69% vs. YUM: 75%
Market capitalization -- QSR: $20.68B vs. YUM: $40.79B
QSR [@Restaurants] is valued at $20.68B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $40.79B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $223.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the long-term than QSR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the short-term than QSR.

Price Growth

QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а -0.11% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was -0.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.05%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.49% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($40.8B) has a higher market cap than QSR($20.7B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than QSR: YUM (28.99) vs QSR (23.90). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 10.606 vs. QSR (-1.013). YUM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.64B vs. QSR (2.44B). QSR has more cash in the bank: 1.03B vs. YUM (677M). YUM has less debt than QSR: YUM (11.4B) vs QSR (16B). QSR has higher revenues than YUM: QSR (9.11B) vs YUM (7.91B).
QSRYUMQSR / YUM
Capitalization20.7B40.8B51%
EBITDA2.44B2.64B92%
Gain YTD-1.01310.606-10%
P/E Ratio23.9028.9982%
Revenue9.11B7.91B115%
Total Cash1.03B677M152%
Total Debt16B11.4B140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSR vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
QSR
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5420
SMR RATING
1..100
3510
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7857
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1931
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (26) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (51). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QSR (54). This means that YUM’s stock grew somewhat faster than QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (35). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (57) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (78). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (31). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSRYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
71%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
37%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
41%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
35%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HOOX100.110.25
+0.25%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long HOOD ETF
FID19.80-0.03
-0.13%
First Trust S&P Int Div Aristocrats ETF
FIXD43.97-0.08
-0.18%
First Trust Smith Opportnstc Fxd Inc ETF
CCEF28.84-0.06
-0.22%
Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF
QCLN37.91-0.66
-1.71%
First Trust NASDAQ® Cln Edge® GrnEngyETF

QSR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QSR has been loosely correlated with YUM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QSR jumps, then YUM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSR
1D Price
Change %
QSR100%
+0.44%
YUM - QSR
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.03%
MCD - QSR
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
DPZ - QSR
46%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
WEN - QSR
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
EAT - QSR
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+1.03%
MCD - YUM
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
QSR - YUM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
DPZ - YUM
48%
Loosely correlated
+2.08%
YUMC - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
WEN - YUM
32%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
More