QSR
Price
$64.80
Change
+$0.31 (+0.48%)
Updated
Sep 25, 10:34 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
21.25B
41 days until earnings call
YUM
Price
$149.45
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
41.48B
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSR vs YUM

Header iconQSR vs YUM Comparison
Open Charts QSR vs YUMBanner chart's image
Restaurant Brands International
Price$64.80
Change+$0.31 (+0.48%)
Volume$618
Capitalization21.25B
Yum! Brands
Price$149.45
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$2.81M
Capitalization41.48B
QSR vs YUM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSR vs. YUM commentary
Sep 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSR is a Buy and YUM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 25, 2025
Stock price -- (QSR: $64.49 vs. YUM: $149.45)
Brand notoriety: QSR: Not notable vs. YUM: Notable
Both companies represent the Restaurants industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSR: 89% vs. YUM: 137%
Market capitalization -- QSR: $21.25B vs. YUM: $41.48B
QSR [@Restaurants] is valued at $21.25B. YUM’s [@Restaurants] market capitalization is $41.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Restaurants] industry ranges from $217.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Restaurants] industry is $7.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileYUM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • QSR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • YUM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, QSR is a better buy in the long-term than YUM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while YUM’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QSR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • YUM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, YUM is a better buy in the short-term than QSR.

Price Growth

QSR (@Restaurants) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while YUM (@Restaurants) price change was +0.80% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -0.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

QSR is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

YUM is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Restaurants (-0.99% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YUM($41.5B) has a higher market cap than QSR($21.2B). YUM has higher P/E ratio than QSR: YUM (29.48) vs QSR (24.34). YUM YTD gains are higher at: 13.018 vs. QSR (1.776). YUM has less debt than QSR: YUM (11.4B) vs QSR (16B).
QSRYUMQSR / YUM
Capitalization21.2B41.5B51%
EBITDAN/A2.64B-
Gain YTD1.77613.01814%
P/E Ratio24.3429.4883%
RevenueN/A7.91B-
Total CashN/A677M-
Total Debt16B11.4B140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSR vs YUM: Fundamental Ratings
QSR
YUM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1717
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4520
SMR RATING
1..100
3510
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1727
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QSR's Valuation (23) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (52). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (45). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's SMR Rating (10) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (35). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

YUM's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (59). This means that YUM’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.

QSR's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as YUM (27). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to YUM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSRYUM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
YUM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHN18.150.22
+1.23%
China Fund
RSPU75.500.46
+0.61%
Invesco S&P 500® Equal Weight Utilts ETF
IPAV28.36N/A
N/A
Global X Infrastructure Dev ex-U.S. ETF
QRFT60.47-0.14
-0.23%
QRAFT AI-Enhanced US Large Cap ETF
IYF125.98-0.60
-0.47%
iShares US Financials ETF

YUM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YUM has been loosely correlated with MCD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YUM jumps, then MCD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YUM
1D Price
Change %
YUM100%
+0.01%
MCD - YUM
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
QSR - YUM
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
DPZ - YUM
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
YUMC - YUM
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
WEN - YUM
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.20%
More