QSEP
Price
$0.20
Change
+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.82M
SBFFF
Price
$25.29
Change
+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.59B
53 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

QSEP vs SBFFF

Header iconQSEP vs SBFFF Comparison
Open Charts QSEP vs SBFFFBanner chart's image
QS Energy
Price$0.20
Change+$0.01 (+5.26%)
Volume$272.85K
Capitalization23.82M
SBM Offshore
Price$25.29
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$500
Capitalization2.59B
QSEP vs SBFFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QSEP vs. SBFFF commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QSEP is a Hold and SBFFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (QSEP: $0.20 vs. SBFFF: $25.29)
Brand notoriety: QSEP and SBFFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oilfield Services/Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QSEP: 97% vs. SBFFF: 121%
Market capitalization -- QSEP: $23.82M vs. SBFFF: $2.59B
QSEP [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] is valued at $23.82M. SBFFF’s [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] market capitalization is $2.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry ranges from $79.1B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oilfield Services/Equipment] industry is $3.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QSEP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSBFFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QSEP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SBFFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SBFFF is a better buy in the long-term than QSEP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QSEP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QSEP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

QSEP (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +21.29% price change this week, while SBFFF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was +5.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +5.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

SBFFF is expected to report earnings on Aug 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oilfield Services/Equipment (+5.43% weekly)

The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBFFF($2.59B) has a higher market cap than QSEP($23.8M). SBFFF YTD gains are higher at: 49.645 vs. QSEP (33.333). SBFFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.13B vs. QSEP (-1.2M). SBFFF has more cash in the bank: 109M vs. QSEP (107K). QSEP has less debt than SBFFF: QSEP (1.91M) vs SBFFF (8.56B). SBFFF has higher revenues than QSEP: SBFFF (4.91B) vs QSEP (0).
QSEPSBFFFQSEP / SBFFF
Capitalization23.8M2.59B1%
EBITDA-1.2M1.13B-0%
Gain YTD33.33349.64567%
P/E RatioN/A5.64-
Revenue04.91B-
Total Cash107K109M0%
Total Debt1.91M8.56B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QSEP vs SBFFF: Fundamental Ratings
QSEP
SBFFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5224
SMR RATING
1..100
10098
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1002
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBFFF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (97). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

SBFFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (52). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

SBFFF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as QSEP (100). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew similarly to QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

QSEP's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SBFFF (38). This means that QSEP’s stock grew similarly to SBFFF’s over the last 12 months.

SBFFF's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for QSEP (100). This means that SBFFF’s stock grew significantly faster than QSEP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSEP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QSEP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMRAX10.08-0.05
-0.49%
Calamos Merger Arbitrage A
VVJEX11.18-0.13
-1.15%
Voya VACS Series MCV Fund
JMVNX14.58-0.25
-1.69%
JHFunds2 Mid Value NAV
EWMCX36.33-0.63
-1.70%
Evercore Equity
WMGRX22.82-0.47
-2.02%
Macquarie Mid Cap Growth R

QSEP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QSEP and ATONY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QSEP and ATONY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QSEP
1D Price
Change %
QSEP100%
+5.26%
ATONY - QSEP
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PDER - QSEP
12%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBFFF - QSEP
6%
Poorly correlated
+0.16%
PSYTF - QSEP
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.64%
MCCRF - QSEP
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
More

SBFFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBFFF and SBFFY have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBFFF and SBFFY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBFFF
1D Price
Change %
SBFFF100%
+0.16%
SBFFY - SBFFF
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QSEP - SBFFF
6%
Poorly correlated
+5.26%
TAGP - SBFFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNVVF - SBFFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
POFCY - SBFFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More