QS
Price
$4.47
Change
+$0.13 (+3.00%)
Updated
Jun 16, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.04B
36 days until earnings call
WLMTF
Price
$0.05
Change
-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Updated
Jun 11 closing price
Capitalization
317.24M
Interact to see
Advertisement

QS vs WLMTF

Header iconQS vs WLMTF Comparison
Open Charts QS vs WLMTFBanner chart's image
QuantumScape
Price$4.47
Change+$0.13 (+3.00%)
Volume$101.76K
Capitalization3.04B
Wuling Motors Holdings
Price$0.05
Change-$0.01 (-16.67%)
Volume$17.9K
Capitalization317.24M
QS vs WLMTF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QS vs. WLMTF commentary
Jun 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QS is a Buy and WLMTF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 17, 2025
Stock price -- (QS: $4.34 vs. WLMTF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: QS and WLMTF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QS: 77% vs. WLMTF: 123%
Market capitalization -- QS: $3.04B vs. WLMTF: $317.24M
QS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $3.04B. WLMTF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $317.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $52.56B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWLMTF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WLMTF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QS and WLMTF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • QS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +5.08% price change this week, while WLMTF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -11.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.92% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.04B) has a higher market cap than WLMTF($317M). WLMTF YTD gains are higher at: 19.369 vs. QS (-16.378). WLMTF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -26.91M vs. QS (-392.95M). WLMTF has more cash in the bank: 3.4B vs. QS (1.07B). QS has less debt than WLMTF: QS (101M) vs WLMTF (2.79B). WLMTF has higher revenues than QS: WLMTF (13.5B) vs QS (0).
QSWLMTFQS / WLMTF
Capitalization3.04B317M959%
EBITDA-392.95M-26.91M1,460%
Gain YTD-16.37819.369-85%
P/E RatioN/A92.59-
Revenue013.5B-
Total Cash1.07B3.4B32%
Total Debt101M2.79B4%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STRGX57.64-0.68
-1.17%
Sterling Capital MdCp Relatv Val Instl
TRIRX68.35-0.88
-1.27%
Nuveen Large Cap Gr Idx Retire
NVLIX61.76-0.88
-1.40%
Nuveen Winslow Large-Cap Growth ESG I
IACIX11.32-0.18
-1.57%
VY® American Century Sm-Mid Cp Val I
SGTRX65.89-1.26
-1.88%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech R

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with THRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then THRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
-3.34%
THRM - QS
38%
Loosely correlated
-2.76%
VC - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.32%
HYLN - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.97%
ADNT - QS
36%
Loosely correlated
-2.95%
CPS - QS
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
More

WLMTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLMTF and BRDCF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLMTF and BRDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLMTF
1D Price
Change %
WLMTF100%
N/A
BRDCF - WLMTF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHKGF - WLMTF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTX - WLMTF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
MNTHY - WLMTF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QS - WLMTF
-1%
Poorly correlated
-3.34%
More