QS
Price
$12.66
Change
+$0.16 (+1.28%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.08B
26 days until earnings call
VLEEF
Price
$12.40
Change
+$0.15 (+1.22%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
3.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

QS vs VLEEF

Header iconQS vs VLEEF Comparison
Open Charts QS vs VLEEFBanner chart's image
QuantumScape
Price$12.66
Change+$0.16 (+1.28%)
Volume$70.17K
Capitalization7.08B
Valeo SE
Price$12.40
Change+$0.15 (+1.22%)
Volume$418
Capitalization3.15B
QS vs VLEEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QS vs. VLEEF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QS is a StrongBuy and VLEEF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (QS: $12.50 vs. VLEEF: $12.40)
Brand notoriety: QS and VLEEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QS: 108% vs. VLEEF: 97%
Market capitalization -- QS: $7.08B vs. VLEEF: $3.15B
QS [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $7.08B. VLEEF’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVLEEF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VLEEF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VLEEF is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VLEEF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • VLEEF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, VLEEF is a better buy in the short-term than QS.

Price Growth

QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.05% price change this week, while VLEEF (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +32.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-0.66% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($7.08B) has a higher market cap than VLEEF($3.15B). QS YTD gains are higher at: 140.848 vs. VLEEF (34.929). VLEEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.72B vs. QS (-382.46M). VLEEF has more cash in the bank: 2.42B vs. QS (797M). QS has less debt than VLEEF: QS (89.4M) vs VLEEF (6.59B). VLEEF has higher revenues than QS: VLEEF (21B) vs QS (0).
QSVLEEFQS / VLEEF
Capitalization7.08B3.15B225%
EBITDA-382.46M2.72B-14%
Gain YTD140.84834.929403%
P/E RatioN/A20.99-
Revenue021B-
Total Cash797M2.42B33%
Total Debt89.4M6.59B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
VLEEF: Fundamental Ratings
VLEEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
47
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QSVLEEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
88%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VLEEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
FOREX / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USDGBP0.74N/A
N/A
United States Dollar - United Kingdom Pound
DFMIX37.46N/A
N/A
Davidson Multi-Cap Equity I
CHFHKD9.79N/A
N/A
Switzerland Franc - Hong Kong Dollar
EURRUB98.35N/A
N/A
Euro - Russia Ruble
JPYAUD0.01N/A
N/A
Japan Yen - Australian Dollar

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SLDP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SLDP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+0.08%
SLDP - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.69%
MBLY - QS
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.36%
LAZR - QS
31%
Poorly correlated
-4.05%
INVZ - QS
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.71%
VC - QS
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.15%
More

VLEEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VLEEF and VLEEY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VLEEF and VLEEY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VLEEF
1D Price
Change %
VLEEF100%
N/A
VLEEY - VLEEF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.26%
SMTOY - VLEEF
11%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
PLLIF - VLEEF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QS - VLEEF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
SMTOF - VLEEF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More