Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QRSVX vs SSGSX
QRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts QRSVX vs SSGSX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value I
Price$42.88
Change+$0.24 (+0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets992.71M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.37
Change+$0.32 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
QRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QRSVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. QRSVX (993M). QRSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: QRSVX (0.73) vs SSGSX (0.51). QRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: QRSVX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than QRSVX (0.99). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. QRSVX (13.00). QRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: QRSVX (1500) vs SSGSX (2500). QRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.54 vs. SSGSX (-8.77). QRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 80.51 vs. SSGSX (23.49).
| QRSVX | SSGSX | QRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.921 | -2.283 | -435% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 993M | 5.73B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.73 | 0.51 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.54 | -8.77 | -132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.75 | -2.14 | -1,627% |
| Returns for 5 years | 80.51 | 23.49 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.52 | 18.39 | 460% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement