Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
QRSVX vs SSGSX
QRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts QRSVX vs SSGSX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value I
Price$44.81
Change+$0.01 (+0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.06B
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.38
Change+$0.08 (+0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
QRSVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
QRSVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QRSVX is a StrongBuy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. QRSVX (1.06B). QRSVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: QRSVX (0.69) vs SSGSX (0.47). QRSVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: QRSVX (23 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than QRSVX (0.99). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. QRSVX (15.00). QRSVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: QRSVX (1500) vs SSGSX (2500). QRSVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.75 vs. SSGSX (-1.56). QRSVX return over 5 years is better than : 83.87 vs. SSGSX (22.95).
| QRSVX | SSGSX | QRSVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.26 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.868 | 2.046 | 727% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1500 | 2500 | 60% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.06B | 5.64B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.69 | 0.47 | 145% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.75 | -1.56 | -1,074% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.75 | 3.97 | 1,076% |
| Returns for 5 years | 83.87 | 22.95 | 365% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.63 | 24.71 | 391% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement