QQFSF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
130.83M
TYCMY
Price
$28.93
Change
-$0.66 (-2.23%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
8.15B
Interact to see
Advertisement

QQFSF vs TYCMY

Header iconQQFSF vs TYCMY Comparison
Open Charts QQFSF vs TYCMYBanner chart's image
Qinqin Foodstuffs Group Cayman
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization130.83M
Tingyi Cayman Islands Holdings
Price$28.93
Change-$0.66 (-2.23%)
Volume$2.45K
Capitalization8.15B
QQFSF vs TYCMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
TYCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QQFSF vs. TYCMY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QQFSF is a Hold and TYCMY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (QQFSF: $0.06 vs. TYCMY: $28.93)
Brand notoriety: QQFSF and TYCMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QQFSF: 100% vs. TYCMY: 12%
Market capitalization -- QQFSF: $130.83M vs. TYCMY: $8.15B
QQFSF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $130.83M. TYCMY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $8.15B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QQFSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTYCMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QQFSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TYCMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, TYCMY is a better buy in the long-term than QQFSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TYCMY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TYCMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

QQFSF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TYCMY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +0.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.81% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TYCMY($8.15B) has a higher market cap than QQFSF($131M). QQFSF has higher P/E ratio than TYCMY: QQFSF (16.66) vs TYCMY (15.68). TYCMY YTD gains are higher at: 18.082 vs. QQFSF (0.000).
QQFSFTYCMYQQFSF / TYCMY
Capitalization131M8.15B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00018.082-
P/E Ratio16.6615.68106%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QQFSF: Fundamental Ratings
QQFSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
72
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QQFSFTYCMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
3%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
2%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TYCMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BUI26.900.27
+1.01%
BlackRock Utilities Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust
BKLN20.95-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco Senior Loan ETF
BBBS51.33-0.03
-0.07%
BondBloxx BBB Rated 1-5 Yr Corp Bd ETF
CBXJ27.67-0.07
-0.25%
Calamos Bitcoin 90 Str Alt Prt ETF-Jan
TFJL19.87-0.13
-0.65%
Innovator 20 Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF

QQFSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QQFSF and NSLYF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QQFSF and NSLYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QQFSF
1D Price
Change %
QQFSF100%
N/A
NSLYF - QQFSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DDC - QQFSF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.27%
STKH - QQFSF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
TYCMY - QQFSF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.23%
BON - QQFSF
2%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More

TYCMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TYCMY and CIADY have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TYCMY and CIADY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TYCMY
1D Price
Change %
TYCMY100%
-2.23%
CIADY - TYCMY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
ARRT - TYCMY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HAIN - TYCMY
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
STKH - TYCMY
15%
Poorly correlated
+1.36%
TUFBY - TYCMY
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More