QNTQY
Price
$27.30
Change
-$0.45 (-1.62%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.55B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SAABY
Price
$38.27
Change
+$10.10 (+35.85%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
40.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

QNTQY vs SAABY

Header iconQNTQY vs SAABY Comparison
Open Charts QNTQY vs SAABYBanner chart's image
Qinetiq Group
Price$27.30
Change-$0.45 (-1.62%)
Volume$1.24K
Capitalization3.55B
Saab AB
Price$38.27
Change+$10.10 (+35.85%)
Volume$104.39K
Capitalization40.52B
QNTQY vs SAABY Comparison Chart in %
QNTQY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAABY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
QNTQY vs. SAABY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is QNTQY is a Hold and SAABY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (QNTQY: $27.30 vs. SAABY: $38.27)
Brand notoriety: QNTQY and SAABY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: QNTQY: 25% vs. SAABY: 64%
Market capitalization -- QNTQY: $3.55B vs. SAABY: $40.52B
QNTQY [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $3.55B. SAABY’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $40.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $325.06B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $24.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

QNTQY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSAABY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • QNTQY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SAABY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both QNTQY and SAABY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

QNTQY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SAABY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • QNTQY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SAABY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both QNTQY and SAABY are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

QNTQY (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -6.91% price change this week, while SAABY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -5.74% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was +31.59%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (-3.11% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SAABY($40.5B) has a higher market cap than QNTQY($3.55B). SAABY has higher P/E ratio than QNTQY: SAABY (71.44) vs QNTQY (19.05). SAABY YTD gains are higher at: 32.102 vs. QNTQY (14.179). SAABY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.13B vs. QNTQY (-1.1M). SAABY has higher revenues than QNTQY: SAABY (72.3B) vs QNTQY (1.89B).
QNTQYSAABYQNTQY / SAABY
Capitalization3.55B40.5B9%
EBITDA-1.1M7.13B-0%
Gain YTD14.17932.10244%
P/E Ratio19.0571.4427%
Revenue1.89B72.3B3%
Total CashN/A8.93B-
Total DebtN/A13.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
QNTQY vs SAABY: Fundamental Ratings
QNTQY
SAABY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8187
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
72
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
426
SMR RATING
1..100
9657
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4536
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
538
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QNTQY's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SAABY (72). This means that QNTQY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SAABY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQY (42). This means that SAABY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's SMR Rating (57) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQY (96). This means that SAABY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as QNTQY (45). This means that SAABY’s stock grew similarly to QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

SAABY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QNTQY (53). This means that SAABY’s stock grew somewhat faster than QNTQY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
QNTQYSAABY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
QNTQY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SAABY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSMEX25.530.23
+0.91%
Carillon Scout Mid Cap A
MCTRX23.960.04
+0.17%
NYLI Income Builder Class C
GBLEX41.38-0.06
-0.14%
American Funds Global Balanced F1
BSGSX15.52-0.05
-0.32%
Baird Small/Mid Cap Growth Investor
LGCAX20.55-0.09
-0.44%
Lord Abbett Global Equity A

QNTQY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QNTQY and AVIJF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QNTQY and AVIJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QNTQY
1D Price
Change %
QNTQY100%
+0.57%
AVIJF - QNTQY
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RNMBY - QNTQY
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
RNMBF - QNTQY
10%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
SAABF - QNTQY
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
SAABY - QNTQY
8%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
More

SAABY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SAABY has been loosely correlated with RNMBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SAABY jumps, then RNMBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SAABY
1D Price
Change %
SAABY100%
+1.32%
RNMBY - SAABY
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.40%
BAESY - SAABY
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.44%
FINMY - SAABY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
RNMBF - SAABY
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
HII - SAABY
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.22%
More